Power of Custodian
Power of Custodian legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Powers of Custodian-Extent and scope.
"Power of Custodian", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15041
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Power of Custodian"
1981 C L C 1219
SULEMAN (REPRESENTED BY HIS HEIRS) AND 11 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus ROCHOMAL AND 19 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Karachi2001 C L C 762
MUHAMMAD DIN and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD AFSAR KHAN and 16 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)2005 Y R 431
MUHAMMAD RAZZAQ and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)1971 S C M R 769
ABDUR REHMAN AND 5 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE CUSTODIAN, EVACUEE PROPERTY, PUNJAB, LAHORE AND 8 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: High Court1982 S C M R 633
ALI MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus FATEH BIBI AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: -- Ss. 3 & 3-A as introduced. by Amended Act XLV of 1958 Evacuee character of property-Petitioner standing by and allowing Deputy Custodian and Custodian to exercise jurisdiction and adjudication going against them challenging their jurisdiction to do so as an afterthought and at a late stage-Finding of Custodian as to property being not evacuee-Held, could not be challenged on factual plane and no question of application of S. 3-A arose.1985 C L C 1377
ALLAH DINA — Petitioner Versus KHAIR MUHAMMAD and others — Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 2006 Supreme Court (AJ&K) 5
MUHAMMAD RIAZ and 8 others — Petitioners Versus PERVAIZ MEHANDI and 72 others — Respondents/Pro forma Respondents
Court: High Court1993 C L C 1648
MUHAMMAD AZAD KHAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus CUSTODIAN OF EVACUEE PROPERTY, AZAD JAMMU AND
Court: Supreme Court (A J & KP L D 1976 Lahore 109
MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus CUSTODIAN, EVACUEE PROPERTY, WEST PAKISTAN,
Court: -- Ss. 43(4) & 58(2)-Delegation of powers-Delegated power, if exercised-Exhausts itself and not subject to appeal and revision unless contrary intention clearly expressed by statute-Power under S. 43(4) being judicial power, not delegatable unless Legislature expressly autho rises, and expressly excepted from delegation by S. 58(2)-Revisional powers of Custodian under S. 43(4) - Could not be delegated -Custodian while allocating duties to Additional Custodian for confirm ing declarations granted by Deputy Custodian, held, did not delegate his revisional powers -Custodian's observation that Additional Custodian would be competent to pass final orders-Did not mean that it would not be subject to provisions of Act XII of 1957-Delega tion of powers.