Ejectment Suit
Ejectment Suit legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
S. 106-Ejectment suit-Petitioner denying respondent's title in property-Such denial, held, operates as forfeiture and dispenses with notice under S. 106-Acceptance of rent after forfeiture, held further, would not show an intention to treat lease as subsisting.
"Ejectment Suit", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15063
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Ejectment Suit"
1984 C L C 1316
ATTA MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1986 C L C 1448
Mst. SAT BHARAI and others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (Rev.) and others‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1994 P T D 44
SWAIKA OIL AND PRODUCE CO. (P.) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Court: 201 I T R 5201990 C L C 1587
NAWAB‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (R), LAHORE DIVISION,
Court: Lahore1993 C L C 1409
Ch. HAMID ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Ch. REHMAT ALI and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1984 C L C 2400
LALA‑ — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, SAPGODHA DIVISION,
Court: LahoreP L D 1979 Lahore 709
Before M. Dilawar Mahmood, J Versus ADDL. SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, REVENUE ETC.-Respondents Writ Petition No. 518 of 1978, decided on 16th October, 1978.
Court: -- R. 7-Interpretation of statutes-Retrospectivity-Legislature altering rights of parties by taking away or conferring any right of action-Such enactment, unless expressly made to apply to pending actions, does not apply to pending actions nor affects them-Exception: Where enactment merely affects procedure and does not extend to right of action-Law and notification impugned not laying down their operation, to be retrospective and appeal also not being a matter or procedure but one of substantive right, right of appeal as provided by para 7 of Rules, held, continues to vest in petitioners and their case to be decided according to law as it existed when ejectment suit filed.-Interpretation of statutes-Appeal (civil).2019 Y L R 2800
MUHAMMAD ASHRAF and another — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (REVENUE), RAWALPINDI DIVISION and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)1994 C L C 893
MISRI KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Board of Revenue Punjab2002 M L D 1350
HUKMI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL II), BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB, LAHORE and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore