Limited in nature
Limited in nature legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
- XXVI-Review jurisdiction-Limited in nature-Point raised in, review proceedings forming part of a contention urged at time of hearing of appeal and dealt with and a finding given-Held, another attempt to reargue point hence not permissible.-[Review by Supreme Court].
"Limited in nature", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15090
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Limited in nature"
1982 S C M R 1152
MESSRS ASSOCIATED CEMENT COMPANIES LTD.‑Petitioner Versus THE PRESIDENT OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: ‑ XXVI‑Review jurisdiction‑Limited in nature‑Point raised in, review proceedings forming part of a contention urged at time of hearing of appeal and dealt with and a finding given‑Held, another attempt to reargue point hence not permissible.‑Review by Supreme Court.1977K24
MESSRS BUTT ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES‑Petitioner Versus SIND LABOUR COURT NO. 1, KARACHI AND ANOTHER- Respondents
Court:1977 P L C 224
MLSSRS BUTT ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES Versus SIND LABOUR COURT NO. 1., KARACHI AND ANOTHER
Court: Karachi2014 Y L R 465
SHAFIQUE AHMAD — Petitioner Versus PUBLIC AT LARGE and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1992 C L C 2457
MERAJ DIN anothers‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Kh. MAHBOOB ELAHI and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2011 C L C 1160
SAIN RAKHIO — Applicant Versus ABDUL GHAFFAR and 5 others — Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1979 Karachi 179
HABIB BANK LTD., KARACHI-Petitioner Versus ZAKI MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUIE AND 2 OTHERs-Respondents
Court: -- S. 115 read with O. XXXVII, r. 2(2)-Revision-Jurisdiction under S. 115, C. P. C.-Limited in nature-Exercise of jurisdiction by District Judge in granting leave to defend suit under O. XXXVII, r. 2(2)-Held, would not attract provisions of S. 115 even if such exercise of power erroneous-Such order of District Judge cannot be said to have been passed without jurisdiction-Question whether order of Court proceeds on illegality or with material irregularity-Depends upon provisions of law so disregarded. -Revision (civil).1987 S C M R 638
CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN RAILWAY BOARD, LAHORE‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ALI‑‑Respondent
Court: High Court2024 M L D 793
Muhammad Ashiq Khan and 4 others — Petitioners Versus Full Board of REvenue, Muzaffarabad and another — Respondents
Court: High Court (AJ&K)2003 S C M R 965
Dr. SALEEM JAVED and others — Appellants Versus Mst. FAUZIA NASIM and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan