Deposit of rent
Deposit of rent legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Rent should be deposited before the 5th of the month i.e. by the 4th of each month.
S. 13(6)-Deposit of rent-Concurrent findings of Courts below on question of default in deposit of rent by tenant-No evidence on record to show that landlord in any manner waived his right to raise question before Court-Order of ejectment maintained by Supreme Court, in circumstances of case.
Tenant not required by law to go to deposit rent personally-Any member of family or a servant could go and perform such duty-Tenant admitting to have a scooter, contention that he could not deposit rent on appointed day due to illness, held, untenable.
"Deposit of rent", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15100
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Deposit of rent"
1981 C L C 1235
Mst. FATIMA BAI AND 7 OTHERS‑‑Appellants Versus REHMATULLAH AND 2 OTHERS‑‑.Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1987 Peshawar 148
ALTAF AMIN‑‑Appellant Versus Qazi MUHAMMAD NAEEM and 4 others‑‑Respondents
Court:2026 Y L R 928
Nasir Ishaq Malik — Appellant Versus Ch. Hasan Nawaz — Respondent
Court: Lahore1986 C L C 731
ANWAR ALI‑‑Appellant Versus Mst. SUGHRA BEGUM‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1982 C L C 384
Ch. MUHAMMAD SHARIF‑Petitioner Versus FAZAL‑UR‑REHMAN ASLAM AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1982 Lahore 652
Mian ALAUDDIN AND ANOTHER ‑Appellants Versus RASHID AHMAD‑Respondent
Court:2007 C L C 1151
MUHAMMAD WAKIL KHAN — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE and 3 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1996 Lahore 252
MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus FAZAL HUSSAIN QURESHI and 2 others ‑‑‑ Respondents
Court:P L D 1982 Lahore 519
GHULAM HUSSAIN‑Petitioner Versus ABDUR REHMAN AND 2 others‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ S. 13 read with S. 2, cls. (a), (c), (i) & (f )‑Denial of tenancy Jurisdiction‑Disputed property if not "building" or "rented land" as defined in S. 2, cls. (a) & (f ), neither petitioner could be treated as tenant nor respondent could be deemed to be landlord for purposes of S. 13‑Petitioner stating property involved in case to be a factory, neither building nor rented land‑Case, held, one of denial of tenancy and Rent Controller possessed no jurisdiction to order deposit of rent unless tenancy established.‑Jurisdiction.1985 C L C 2620
Haji NOORUL HASSAN — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT JUDGE, DERA ISMAIL KHAN and 8 others — Respondents
Court: Peshawar