Home Maxims & Terms Deficiency of Court-fee meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Deficiency of Court-fee

Deficiency of Court-fee legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1981 SCMR 155 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 149-Deficiency in court-fee-Discretion of Court-Discretion vests in Court to allow defendant to pay deficiency in court-fee at any stage-Such permission being granted and fee paid, fee deemed to have been paid in first instance.[Court fee].

1981 SCMR 43 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 149, 148 read with S. 151-Deficiency of court-fee

Extension of time-Contention that petitioner having no information to pay court-fee could not comply with order although he deposited pre-emption money-High Court dismissing appeal holding that trial Court could have passed a conditional order calling upon petitioner to make up deficiency in court-fee failing which plaint would stand rejected and no sufficient cause shown for enlargement of time to make up deficiency in court-fee-Contention dealt with at great length and with thoroughness by High Court and answered in negative and nothing possible to be usefully added to reasons assigned by High Court-Petition dismissed.-[Court-fee].

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Deficiency of Court-fee", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15111

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Deficiency of Court-fee"

CLC 2010
2009-October-5

2010 C L C 513

Syed IQBAL HUSSAIN SHAH and 10 others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMD NASEEM and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1954
12th June 1954, against the order of the Senior Sub‑Judge, Bahawalpur, dated the 12th November 1953

P L D 1954 Baghdad﷓ul﷓﷓Jadid 42

GHULAM MUHAMMAD SHAH‑Petitioners Versus QADIR BAKHSH and others‑Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2019
Civil Appeal No.135 of 2017, decided on 19th September, 2018.

2019 Y L R 233

MUHAMMAD ANSAR and another — Appellants Versus GENERAL MANAGER, MIAN MUHAMMAD SUGAR MILL LIMITED and 19 others — Respondents

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
CLCN 2017
2016-November-23

2017 C L C Note 88

RAZA TAUFEEQ and another — Petitioners Versus HAMMAD HUSSAIN and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1989
Regular Second Appeal No.3 of 1985, heard on 20th March,1989

1989 C L C 1099

TALIB HUSSAIN‑‑Appellant Versus BADAR UL SALAM and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2005
Writ Petition No.298/BWP of 2002, heard on 14th October, 2003.

P L D 2005 Lahore 89

HASNAIN RAZA‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. BALQEES GHAZAL and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
YLR 2008
Civil Revision 1196 of 2007, decided on 20th May, 2008.

2008 Y L R 2172

MUHAMMAD RIAZ and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD AZAM — Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2024
N/A

2024 M L D 1550

Muhammad Azeem — Petitioner Versus Noor Muhammad through LRs — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
CLC 2013
2013-June-13

2013 C L C 1892

MUBARAK ALI — Petitioner Versus SAQIB MUNIR — Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 1999
Regular Second Appeal No.3 of 1983, decided on 27th November, 1998.

1999 C L C 892

Mst. KHURSHID BEGUM and 6 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus TARIQ RASHID MAHBUBI and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore