Arsenic
Arsenic legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Quantitative estimate-Unfair to try to discredit test employed by expert by reference to books with which expert witness was not confronted.
"Arsenic", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15122
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Arsenic"
1979 S C M R 574
TALEH MAND‑Petitioner Versus QUDRATULAH Etc.‑Respondents
Court: ----S. 302‑Murder‑case‑Poisoning‑Appreciation of evidence Statement of witness B not making any mention of poison and merely mentioning all five accused having served him vermicelli‑Witness B having recovered in a few days, his evidence not a link in chain of evidence against appellants‑Prosecution case resting entirely on evidence of extra‑judicial confession and of recovery of arsenic, at first appellant's instance‑Recovery witness imported from a distance of one mile and his evidence self‑contradictory‑Recovery allegedly made from above a beam in ceiling of room of deceased and roof admitted to have been dismantled and its material sold off after death of deceased‑Recovery also made nearly three months after occurrence‑‑Evidence of recovery of arsenic, in circumstances, not confidence inspiring‑Witnesses deposing as to extra‑judicial confession making discrepant and inconsistent statements and their evidence having been rightly rejected by trial Court and High Court in respect of accused same not acceptable against appellants without corroboration‑No evidence however corroborating statements of such witnesses‑Evidence of motive coming from mouth of very witnesses whose evidence required corroboration same of no corroborative value‑No error of law in findings of first Appellate Court and no case being made out for grant of special leave, petition for leave to appeal dismissed.1971 P Cr
Dr. SARWAR H. REHMAN‑Applicant/Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1957 (W
MUHAMMAD RAMZAN‑Convict‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: High Court1971 P Cr
RASHID alias KAKA‑Convict‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1954 Lahore 103
MANZUR HUSSAIN SHAH‑Convict‑Appellant Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1956 Privy Council 61
EBENEZER THEODORE JOSHUA‑‑Appellant Versus THE QUEEN‑‑Respondent
Court:1983 P Cr
DR. MUHAMMAD UMAR NIZAMI‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: KarachiPLD 1958 Dacca 1
MAMTAJUDDIN KHAN‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:1968 P Cr
Mst. ANWARI‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2020 Supreme Court 142
MUHAMMAD ASLAM SIDDIQUI — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan