Abandonment of appeal
Abandonment of appeal legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Appellant expressing his wish not to prosecute appeal and seeking permission to withdraw from case-Appellant allowed to withdraw but, nevertheless Court itself proceeded with hearing of appeal
Appellant, held, had no right to abandon appeal at his will.-[Abandonment of appeal].
"Abandonment of appeal", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15140
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Abandonment of appeal"
1973 S C M R 319
MUHAMMAD LATIF — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: --- Ss. 423 & 561-A-Abandonment of appeal--Appellant expressing his wish not to prosecute appeal and seeking permission to withdraw from case-Appellant allowed to withdraw but, nevertheless Court itself proceeded with hearing of appeal--Appellant, held, had no right to abandon appeal at his will.-Abandonment of appeal.1978 S C M R 374
MUHAMMAD LATIF-Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AND ANOTHER — Respondents
Court: ---Withdrawal-Appellant's counsel seeking permission to withdraw from case- Withdrawal allowed but Court proceeding with hearing of appeal, appellant having no right to abandon appeal at stage of hearing.-Abandonment of appeal.1976 S C M R 425
SHAH MUHAMMAD‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD YUNIS AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1985 Lahore 78
Before Rustam S. Sidhwa, J Versus NIAZ AHMAD AND 3 OTHERS-Respondents
Court:P L D 1975 Supreme Court 160
Syed MUSHTAQ AHMAD‑Appellant Versus SIDDIQULLAH AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Appeal against acquittal of person charged with offence of murder-- Murder case resting principally on testimony of two eye‑witnesses, medical evidence, motive and fact of absconding of accused after occur rence‑Conviction recorded by trial Court‑High Court (in appeal against conviction) setting aside conviction and acquitting convict on ground that (i) eye‑witness asserted that two shots were fired whereas medical evidence showed that more than two shots were fired; (ii) pre sence of undigested food in deceased's stomach incompatible with time of incident; (iii) eye‑witness related to deceased, (iv) motive in circumstances immaterial‑Appeal against acquittal to Supreme Court‑Supreme Court set aside acquittal and held : (per majority) witness to be believed or disbelieved on reasonable ground and not on mere speculations; mere relationship with deceased no ground for disbelieving testimony of eye‑witness : testimony of eye‑witness was supported by motive, medical evidence and fact that accused absconded after occurrence‑Per Muhammad Afzal Cheema, J. dissenting mere possibility that Supreme Court on reappraisal of evidence and facts and circumstances of case might reach a different conclusion‑Not good enough to justify interference with judgment of acquittal‑Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 417‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 302.1981 S C M R 1
HAYAT BAKHSH AND OTHERS-Appellants Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: -- Art. 185(2), (3) read with Art. 187-Appeal to Supreme Court -Absconsion-Appeal of absconding convict, whether filed as of right or on grant of special leave, held, can be concluded without hearing same on merits-Nothing in Constitution bars decision of appeal on basis other than merits-Power of Supreme Court extends to passing of all orders necessary for doing complete justice or otherwise ancillary or incidental to facilitate exercise of such power.-Absconsion-Appeal (criminal).1981S41
HAYAT BAKHSH AND others‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑ Art. 185 (2), (3) read with Art. 187‑Appeal to Supreme Court Absconsion‑Appeal of absconding convict, whether filed as of right or on grant of special leave, held, can be concluded without hearing same on merits‑Nothing in Constitution bars decision of appeal on basis other than merits‑Power of Supreme Court extends to passing of all orders necessary for doing complete justice or otherwise ancillary or incidental to facilitate exercise of such power.‑Absconsion‑Appeal (criminal).1985 C L C 1561
Messrs DAILY AZAD, DACCA and others-Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD QAMARUDDIN and others — Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1994 Supreme Court 242
Haji JAN MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCIAL WATER BOARD, BALOCHISTAN, QUETTA
Court:1989 SCMR 1587
QAMRUZ ZAMAN KHAN and another Appellants Versus PAKISTAN through Secretary, Cabinet Division and another Respondents
Court: High Court