Order without jurisdiction
Order without jurisdiction legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Both the terms have their own independent entities and entail different consequences.
Both the terms have their own independent entities and entail different consequences.
"Void order" and "order without jurisdiction"-Interpretation
"Order without jurisdiction", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15146
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Order without jurisdiction"
2002 C L D 1772
Messrs AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Appellant Versus Messrs BIO‑TECH. (PVT.) LTD. Through Javed Qureshi and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1969 P Cr
ALI HOSSAIN‑Petitioner Versus SAYEDUR RAHMAN‑Opposite‑Party
Court: Dacca1986 C L C 1657
Messrs SIND TANNERIES Ltd.‑‑Applicant Versus ABDUL WARIS KHAN‑‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑S. 39 & O. XXI, r. 6‑‑Executing Court‑‑Want of jurisdiction‑‑Exercise of power‑‑Extent of‑‑Executing Court directing return of decree and other papers to Court which had sent for execution thereof, for want of jurisdiction‑‑Such executing Court, held, would have no further jurisdiction to entertain another execution application and allow same‑ First Appellate Court consequently could only interfere with order of executing Court to extent of declaring same as order without jurisdiction and ordering for return of execution application to decree‑holder for presentation to proper Court‑‑First Appellate Court, however, could not dismiss execution application as time‑barred‑‑Such questions should have been left to be dealt with according to law by Court sending same for execution.‑‑Jurisdiction.1996 M L D 1964
Haji MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR through Chief Secretary, Muzafarabad and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)1992 C L C 317
JAN MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ALLAH DITTA and others‑‑‑Respondents.
Court: Lahore2011 PLC (C
SARIR MUHAMMAD KHAN Versus PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION LTD. through Chairman, and 2 others
Court: Karachi High CourtP L D 1977 Supreme Court 599
MESSRS CONFORCE LTD.-Petitioners Versus SYED ALI SHAH ETC.-Respondents
Court: -- O. IX, r. 7 read with S. 151-Exparte order, setting aside of Contention that impugned order being void could be challenged at any time irrespective of question of limitation-Held : Explanation that impugned order was void because it was passed on a date not fixed for hearing no adequate explanation because question depended on order passed on previous date and such order not produced Void order of an order without jurisdiction only a type: of an illegal order passed by a Court and fact that it has been passed and may therefore create rights cannot be altered by describing it as void or without jurisdiction-Expression 'void order' or 'older without jurisdiction'-Better to use in narrow and original tense of lack of competence of Court or tribunal to enter upon inquiry in question.Void order.1989 P T D 817
Messrs ARIF MEDICINE CO. Versus THE C.I.T. LAHORE
Court: Lahore High Court1983 C L C 2502
SHER MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND OTHERS‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1980 Peshawar 213
Mst. BIBI JANA‑Petitioner Versus THE DEPUTY LAND COMMISSIONER, PESHAWAR AND 2 OTHERS‑‑Respondents
Court: High Court