Original order
Original order legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Words and Phrases Term "proceedings" its scope, meaning and import judicially analyzed.
"Original order", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1515
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Original order"
2026 P T D (Trib
DILSON (PVT.) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, CTO, LAHORE
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal1993 P T D 825
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus SHAW WALLACE & CO. LTD.
Court: 199 I T R 1052022 M L D 1195
LIAQAT ALI — Appellant Versus DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUJRAT and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore2024 P L C (C
NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through President and another Versus MUHAMMAD ADEEL and others
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1987 Lahore 417
NOOK MUHAMMAD and 4 others‑‑Appellants Versus Syed WALAYAT ALI and another ‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑S. 3(2), proviso as amended‑‑Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958), Ss. 10 & 11‑‑Expression "original order" in S.3, Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972, its import, tenor and implication‑ Intra‑Court Appeal‑‑Maintainability‑‑Where original order of allotment of land was subject to appeal/ revision, Intra‑Court Appeal against order passed in, constitutional petition is not maintainable and is incompetent as envisaged by S.3(2),, proviso.2024 S C M R 982
NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN through President and another — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ADEEL and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1985 Supreme Court 107
MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH-Appellant Versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, CENTRE-I, LAHORE- Respondent
Court: -- S. 3(2), proviso as amended by Law Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance (XXXIV of 1972) and Law Reforms (Amendment) Act (VIII of 1972)-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199-Order passed by a Single Judge of High Court under Art. 199, Constitution of Pakistan (1973) - Expression "Original Order" occurring in S. 3(2), proviso, means order with which proceedings under relevant statute commenced-Relevant law providing for an appeal against original order, intra-Court appeal, held, was not competent in such case.-Words and phrases.2019 Y L R 2347
ZUBAIDA BE (Deceased) through L.Rs. and others — Appellants Versus Raja MUNIR AHMED and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)1986 M L D 491
TAYYAB and 2 others‑‑Appellants Versus NAZIR AHMAD and 5 others‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1984 Supreme Court 343
Present : Muhammad Haleem, C. J., Aslam Riaz Hussain, Zaffar Hussain Mirza and Milan Burhanuddin Khan, JJ Versus Civil Appeal No. 219 of 1976, decided on 4th April, 1984.
Court: -- S. 3 (2) as amended by Law Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance (XXXIV of 1972) and Law Reforms (-Amendment) Act (Vill of 1972)Letters Patent Appeal filed on 31-8-1974 on which date S. 3(2), Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972 stood amended and substituted by Ordinance XXXIV of 1972 with a further retrospective amendment from 11-9-1972