Excise Duty
Excise Duty legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Appellant paid Federal Excise Duty on its supplies of locally purchased raw material for production of cooking oil under S.7 of Federal Excise Act, 2005, under sales tax mode
Appellant claimed refund of excise duty but the refund of the appellant was considered as inadmissible with the observation that it was claimed under S.66 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, whereas the provisions of Federal Excise Act, 2005 were applicable
Validity
Federal Tax Ombudsman had directed the department to proceed the matter in the light of factual position instead of proceeding under pre-conceived notion
Appellate Tribunal annulled the impugned order with the direction to the appellant to claim refund under S.44(3) of Federal Excise Act, 2005, and the concerned processing officer was also directed to process/allow the same in accordance with law
Appeal of the taxpayer succeeded accordingly.
Rr. 3 & 4-Excise duty-Abatement of-Impugned order passed by Central Board of Revenue not a speaking order and not giving any reasons whatsoever in support-Central Board of Revenue in its order allowing partial abatement evidently satisfied as to shortfall in production being substantial and beyond respondent's control Board in disallowing shortfall for remaining quantity of sugar, as claimed by respondent, relying on its own formula by applying 10% cut on total production capacity-Board failing to even consider case set up by respondent in its application under R. 4-Board, in so doing. held, acted almost mechanically, failed to exercise discretion vested it under law, and did not act justly, fairly and reasonably, having full regard to facts and circumstances of case, nor weighed and examined merits of claim pleaded by respondent-Petition dismissed is circumstances.-[ Abatement].
Rajasthan becoming a Part B State-Local laws repealed and Indian Acts extended to Part B State-Concessions under agreement whether enforceable against Union of India or State Government of Rajasthan-Constitution, of India, Arts. 19, 31, 295, 372
Income-tax Act, 1922
Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944-Finance Act, 1950, Ss. 11,13
Rajasthan Administration Ordinance, 1949, S. 3
Rajasthan Excise Duties Ordinance, 1949, S. 34.
"Excise Duty", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15152
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Excise Duty"
2003 P T D 1002
Messrs LUCKY CEMENT LIMITED Versus C.B.R. and others
Court: Peshawar High Court1989 M L D 1
KOHINOOR INDUSTRIES LTD., FAISALABAD and others‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1990 Karachi 324
Messrs USMAN TEXTILE MILLS Ltd.‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & LAND CUSTOMS,
Court:2007 P T D 2
Messrs ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. through Executive Director (Finance) Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE (ADJUDICATION) KARACHI-III, KARACHI
Court: Karachi High Court1996 S C M R 700
CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and 3 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus SEVEN‑UP BOTTLING COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. ‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1990 M L D 290
TAJ MAHAL HOTELS Ltd.‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 3 others Respondents
Court: Karachi2007 P T D 171
Messrs HABIB SUGAR MILLS LTD. through Law Officer Versus ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, SALES TAX, CUSTOMS HOUSE, SITE HYDERABAD and 2 others
Court: Karachi High Court1992 C L C 512
NOORANI COTTON CORPORATION‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1997 M L D 3153
Messrs TARIQ SULTAN & CO ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Quetta1999 Y L R 166
SHELL PAKISTAN LTD. Through Legal Affairs Advisor and 5 others‑‑‑Plaintiffs Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD through Secretary and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi