Home Maxims & Terms Excise Duty meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Excise Duty

Excise Duty legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2021 PTD 150 INLAND REVENUE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL OF PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Ss.7 & 44Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), S.66Excise dutyProvisions of the Sales Tax Act, 1990ApplicabilityRefund of excise duty to be claimed within one yearScope

Appellant paid Federal Excise Duty on its supplies of locally purchased raw material for production of cooking oil under S.7 of Federal Excise Act, 2005, under sales tax mode

Appellant claimed refund of excise duty but the refund of the appellant was considered as inadmissible with the observation that it was claimed under S.66 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990, whereas the provisions of Federal Excise Act, 2005 were applicable

Validity

Federal Tax Ombudsman had directed the department to proceed the matter in the light of factual position instead of proceeding under pre-conceived notion

Appellate Tribunal annulled the impugned order with the direction to the appellant to claim refund under S.44(3) of Federal Excise Act, 2005, and the concerned processing officer was also directed to process/allow the same in accordance with law

Appeal of the taxpayer succeeded accordingly.

1978 SCMR 428 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Rr. 3 & 4-Excise duty-Abatement of-Impugned order passed by Central Board of Revenue not a speaking order and not giving any reasons whatsoever in support-Central Board of Revenue in its order allowing partial abatement evidently satisfied as to shortfall in production being substantial and beyond respondent's control Board in disallowing shortfall for remaining quantity of sugar, as claimed by respondent, relying on its own formula by applying 10% cut on total production capacity-Board failing to even consider case set up by respondent in its application under R. 4-Board, in so doing. held, acted almost mechanically, failed to exercise discretion vested it under law, and did not act justly, fairly and reasonably, having full regard to facts and circumstances of case, nor weighed and examined merits of claim pleaded by respondent-Petition dismissed is circumstances.-[ Abatement].

1968 PTD 461 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Income-tax-Excise duty-Native State - Jodhpur - Concessions under agreement with rulerAccession of State to India-Formation of United State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan becoming a Part B State-Local laws repealed and Indian Acts extended to Part B State-Concessions under agreement whether enforceable against Union of India or State Government of Rajasthan-Constitution, of India, Arts. 19, 31, 295, 372

Income-tax Act, 1922

Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944-Finance Act, 1950, Ss. 11,13

Rajasthan Administration Ordinance, 1949, S. 3

Rajasthan Excise Duties Ordinance, 1949, S. 34.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Excise Duty", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15152

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Excise Duty"

PTD 2003
Writ Petitions Nos. 1144 and 1526 of 1997, decided on 25th May, 2002.

2003 P T D 1002

Messrs LUCKY CEMENT LIMITED Versus C.B.R. and others

Court: Peshawar High Court
MLD 1989
Writ Petitions Nos. 2635 of 1975, 1720 of 1977, 2554 of 1978 and 2066 of 1986, decided on 3rd December, 1988.

1989 M L D 1

KOHINOOR INDUSTRIES LTD., FAISALABAD and others‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1990
Constitutional Petition No. D‑1705 of 1987, decided on 27th April, 1989.

P L D 1990 Karachi 324

Messrs USMAN TEXTILE MILLS Ltd.‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & LAND CUSTOMS,

Court:
PTD 2007
Special Customs Appeal No. 202 of 2003, decided on 26th September, 2006.

2007 P T D 2

Messrs ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. through Executive Director (Finance) Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE (ADJUDICATION) KARACHI-III, KARACHI

Court: Karachi High Court
SCMR 1996
Civil Appeal No. 20 of 1994, decided on 4th February, 1996.

1996 S C M R 700

CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE and 3 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus SEVEN‑UP BOTTLING COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. ‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 1990
Constitutional Petition No. D‑647 of 1986, decided on 1st November, 1989.

1990 M L D 290

TAJ MAHAL HOTELS Ltd.‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary Ministry of Finance, Islamabad and 3 others Respondents

Court: Karachi
PTD 2007
Special Sales Tax Appeal No.14 of 1999, decided on 13th October, 2006.

2007 P T D 171

Messrs HABIB SUGAR MILLS LTD. through Law Officer Versus ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, SALES TAX, CUSTOMS HOUSE, SITE HYDERABAD and 2 others

Court: Karachi High Court
CLC 1992
Writ Petitions Nos. 1526 of 1972, 1246 and 1994 of 1975, decided on 27th April, 1976. .

1992 C L C 512

NOORANI COTTON CORPORATION‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1997
Civil Petition No.290 of 1996, decided on 8th May, 1997.

1997 M L D 3153

Messrs TARIQ SULTAN & CO ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Quetta
YLR 1999
Suits Nos. 1498 to 1500, 1520 of 1998 and 44 of 1999, decided on 20th May, 1999.

1999 Y L R 166

SHELL PAKISTAN LTD. Through Legal Affairs Advisor and 5 others‑‑‑Plaintiffs Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ISLAMABAD through Secretary and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi