Use of unfair means at examination
Use of unfair means at examination legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Reglns. 13 & 18 read with Punjab University Rules, r. 20 (a)-Disciplinary proceedings-Use of unfair means at examination-Proof Natural justice, principle of-Student served with a detailed show cause notice, student replying to such notice in extenso and thereafter appearing before Disciplinary Committee and heard by such Committee in regard to allegations made against him, student in circumstances, held, cannot complain of no reasonable opportunity to defend him having been given.-[Disciplinary proceedings-Natural justice, principles of].
"Use of unfair means at examination", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15171
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Use of unfair means at examination"
1981 S C M R 364
SHAUKAT ALI-Appellant Versus THE CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF
Court: --- Vol. I, Reglns. 13 & 18 (3)-Disciplinary proceedings-Use of unfair means at examination-Natural justice, principles of Persons in charge of educational institutions-To be given fullest authority vis-a -vis their students in same runner as parent or guardian-Presumption in case of disciplinary proceedings against student for using unfair means at examination that student proceeded against properly and without malice-Malice if alleged against authority of institution burden lies on student making such allegation-Malice if proved by production of evidence, burden shifts on authorities to establish charge on basis of evidence and such evidence to be recorded in student's presence-Student in such case to be afforded opportunity to cross -examine witnesses and to produce his own evidence in rebuttal- Action initiated against student not shown based on mala fides, quite proper, held, for authorities to proceed for violating rules providing fair opportunity to student to correct or contradict any relevant statement prejudicial to his interest and authorities under no compulsion to frame formal charge-sheet or to examine witness in student's presence or to afford him opportunity of cross-examining such witnesses. Disciplinary proceedings-Malice-Natural justice, principles of.P L D 1981 Lahore 244
ZAFARULLAH‑Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY
Court: Art. 199‑Writ petition, maintainability of‑Student petitioner's case finding him guilty of adopting unfair means at examination under consideration on appeal before Appellate Committee‑Writ petition against order holding him guilty nevertheless, held, maintain able.‑Educational Institutions.PLD 1996 Supreme Court 709
ABDUL JANAN ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR .
Court:2010 C L C 95
MUZAFFAR ALI KHAN — Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE
Court: LahoreP L D 2005 Supreme Court 443
BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, QUETTA through Controller of Examinations and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus YASIR ARAFAT and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Per Faqir Muhammad Khokhar, J; Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan, J. agreeing‑‑Majority view.P L D 1988 Peshawar 99
SIKANDAR SADIQ and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR and 5 others‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑ Examination‑‑Maxim‑‑Audi alteram partem (no man should be condemned unheard)‑‑Unfair means used in examination hall on massive scale‑‑Examination held on specified dates declared to be null and void by Authority‑‑Plea of examinees that before such action was taken by Authority they were not given opportunity of making their defence‑Validity of such plea‑‑Principle that no man should be condemned unheard to consequences resulting from misconduct and without allowing opportunity of making his defence, held, would not be attracted in a case where unfair means were adopted or, acts of indiscipline committed by all examinees in examination hall.‑‑Maxim.2000 S C M R 1030
RAWALPINDI through Chairman and another — Petitioners Versus SEHR AZMAT and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2001 M L D 936
Mst. FARAH‑UL‑MOMENEEN‑‑‑‑Petitioner Versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY
Court: LahoreP L D 1988 Supreme Court 638
SIKANDAR SADIQ and others‑‑Petitioners Versus UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR and others‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑University examinations‑‑Use of unfair means involving large majority of candidates and almost all the varieties of unfair means‑ University/Vice‑Chancellor, held, had ample power to annul the examination‑‑Such residuary power, even if it were conceded that no specific rule dealt with absolutely similar situation, would also be deemed to be inherent in the University‑‑Examinations, having been validly annulled in their entirety, question of the individual grievances of each examinee would not arise as in law there was no examination at all‑‑Result of annulment being that all the examinees had to appear again in the fresh examinations. p. 641 A1987 C L C 891,
MAHMOOD AHMED Petitioner Versus CONTROLLER, EXAMINATIONS
Court: Lahore