Requisition of House
Requisition of House legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Becoming illegal after passing of Punjab Requisitioning of Immovable Property (Temporary Powers) Repeal Act (XIV of 1954)-Possession of house, however, regularised by a new order of requisition under Punjab Requisitioning of Immovable. Property (Temporary Powers) Ordinance (III of 1955)-Case not a ft one for exercise of writ jurisdiction on score of earlier illegal possession.
"Requisition of House", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15186
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Requisition of House"
1992 M L D 2146
TANVIR AHMED KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1986 P L C 771
AUTHORITY and another Versus MUHAMMAD YASIN and 2 others
Court: Lahore High Court1976 S C M R 176
ESTATE OFFICER KARACHI‑‑Petitioner Versus AKHUND ABDUL LATIF AHD 2 OTHERS‑RESPONDENTS
Court: High Court1982 C L C 247
AKRAM SULTAN‑Petitioner Versus COMMISSIONER RAWALPINDI AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1992 M L D 115
Ch. MAZHAR ALI ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ISLAMABAD and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore.1980 P T D 303
GANESH CHANDRA KHAN Versus INCOME‑TAX OFFICER AND ANOTHER
Court: Calcutta (India)P L D 1956 (W
Sh. ABDUL AZIZ and another‑Petitioners Versus HOME SECRETARY, WEST PAKISTAN GOVERNMENT and others‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1960 Supreme Court (Pak
PAKISTAN, through Ministry of Works, Government of Pakistan, Karachi and another-Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ALI and others-Respondents
Court: (b) Sind (Requisition of Land) Act (XLVI of 1947), S. 3-A- Act not invalid for failure of S. 3-A to provide for compensation "specifically" for lessees where property in their possession under lease is requisitioned-Section 3-A enjoins payment of compensation, but leaves person to whom compensation is to be paid unspecified-Person entitled to retain lawful possession entitled to compensation whether owner, lessee, or mortgagee in possession Miran Khan v. Meharban Hussain P L D 1956 Kar. 338 overruled.PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB----Appellant
PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB‑‑‑‑Appellant Versus AMIN JAN NAEEM and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑Contract‑‑‑Government is supposed to preserve and, enforce the valid contracts and not to force the people to breach them.‑‑Contract.2008 Y L R 2205
Haji MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE — Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR GENERAL ANTI-CORRUPTION ESTABLISHMENT, PUNJAB and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore