Alienation of land

Restriction being on alienation of "portion of his holding" which had effect of reducing a holding to an area less than area of subsistence holding, taint was confined to a small portion which was sever-able and such severance was in accord with general principles of law and public policy behind it

Law is to be applied to decree as it stands irrespective of and ignoring subsequent concessions made by parties-Decree

Inadequacy of consideration whether by itself could be a ground sufficient for refusal to validate transaction of sale-Plausible reason given for apparent inadequacy of consideration

Grounds raised for protecting sale being relatable to facts which were considered by competent authority, could not be re-examined in Constitutional jurisdiction

High Court's order refusing interference being unexceptionable, leave to appeal refused.

Alienation of land-Riwaj-i-Am (1887) of Gujar Khan Tahsil- Preferable to Riwaj-i-Am (1910) of such Tahsil-Sonless Bhatti Rajput proprietor resident of Gujjar Khan Teshil-Held, competent to alienate his ancestral land by way of gift to his daughter's son.

Appellant, an allottee of State land, before making its full payment, entering into its sale agreement-Sale price received and possession transferred to vendors on 2-10-1971 under intimation to Revenue Staff-Mutations, however, entered and sanctioned after 20-12-1971

Alienation, in circumstances, held, not affected by provisions of para. 7(1) a)

Mutations, in circumstances, though sanctioned after 20-12-1971, held, should be accepted as in order in view of Explanation III, para. 7(1)(b).