Change of group

Change of group legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1981 SCMR 481 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Examination - Change of group - Contention that respondent examinee could not have appeared for improvement of division/marks in examination for a group different from his earlier group-Authorities having allowed examinee to change his group and permitted him to appear at examination and not prevented him from doing so and no explanation given for doing so, some confusion about application of rules to a particular region, held, exists and authorities concerned having contributed to such conduct, case not fit for interference.

How to cite this page: "Change of group", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15199

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Change of group"

CLC 1999

Writ Petition No. 1481 of 1998(Rawalpindi), heard on 23rd July, 1998

1999 C L C 157

Miss MARRIYAM MUBASHIR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND

Court: Lahore

PLC(CS) 2006

N/A

2006 P L C (C

SYED JUNAID ARSHAD, DEPUTY COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court

PLC(CS) 2000

----S. 4---Res judicata, principles of---Applicability---Appeal filed by civil servant, was challenged on question of res judicata alleging that same cause of action was subject-matter of litigation in earlier appeal filed by civil servant---Civil servant, in earlier appeal had challenged the original order and it was not decided on merits, rather it was dismissed on the legal ground of maintainability to exhaust departmental remedy, whereas present appeal was primarily based on a new cause of action---Fresh appeal having new ground and in compliance with the spirit of the earlier judgment by removing the legal infirmity in earlier appeal, case was not disposed of on merits, ingredients required to attract the principle of res judicata were not available---Appeal was maintainable in circumstances.

2000 P L C (C

NAZ HASSAN TUIIERANI Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and 2 others.

Court: Federal Service Tribunal

SCMR 1981

Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 15-R of 1981, decided on 16th March, 1981.

1981 S C M R 481

EDUCATION, RAWALPINDI-Petitioner Versus SULEMAN MANSOOR AHMAD — Respondent

Court: High Court

SCMR 2017

Crl. O.Ps. Nos. 47, 48 and 50 of 2016 in C.R.P. 193 of 2013 and Crl. M.A. No.1822 of 2016, decided on 16th February, 2017.