Co-ownership
Co-ownership legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
"Co-ownership" and "co-sharership"-Difference.
"Co-ownership", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15249
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Co-ownership"
P L D 2006 Lahore 4
KHUDA BAKHSH and another — Petitioners Versus GUL HUSSAIN and 7 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1989 Peshawar 121
Mst. MUBARIK JAN‑‑Petitioner Versus SULTAN and another‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑S. 12‑‑Pre‑emption‑‑Co‑sharer in 'Kassi'‑‑Right of pre‑emption‑ Word 'Kassi', connotation of‑‑Distinction between "Kassi" and "Lakhti"‑‑"Kassi" being a rain water channel carries water only, when there is sufficient rain and water flows down‑‑For most of the period "Kassi" is dry and is mostly used as a thoroughfare‑‑Share in a "Kassi" neither can be alienated nor can be partitioned‑‑Person claiming co‑ownership in a "Kassi" cannot be held to be a proprietor of the same‑‑"Kassi" is altogether different from a "Lakhti"‑‑Latter is a water channel carrying water meant for irrigation of land‑‑Such water channel is capable of being alienated and owner of land contiguous to such irrigation water channel can always alienate portion of such water channel in his possession‑‑ Co‑owner in a "Kassi" however, cannot exclusively possess any portion thereof nor such a portion is capable of being alienated‑ ‑Pre‑emptor thus could not claim any exclusive right of ownership in the "Kassi" which was running adjacent to the suit land‑‑Concurrent finding of two Courts below dismissing pre‑emptor's suit was maintained.‑‑Words and phrases.1994 C L C 1587
MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE‑‑‑Appellant Versus RAHIM BAKHSH and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1987 S C M R 1497
Mst. MARYAM and others‑‑Petitioners Versus NIAZI and others‑‑Respondents
Court: High Court1994 C L C 641
Syed NAZIR HUSSAIN ‑‑‑Appellant Versus FAZAL RAO ‑‑‑ Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1988 Supreme Court 730
AIWAZ KHAN and another‑‑Appellants Versus ALLAH BAKHSH‑‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑Ss. 15 & 30‑‑Decree for pre‑emption passed for the ‑first time after 31‑7‑1986‑‑Validity‑‑No 'decree can be passed now after the said date in favour of pre‑emptor on any ground‑co‑ownership contiguity etc. p. 730 A2016 S C M R 24
NAZIM-UD-DIN and others — Appellants Versus Sheikh ZIA-UL-QAMAR and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2025 S C M R 787
Al-Haaj Malik MUHAMMAD ASHRAF — Petitioner Versus JAVED AKHTAR and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1985 S C M R 1851
MIR AHMAD — Appellant Versus ATAULLAH and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2012 Peshawar 89
QAZA KHAN and 4 others — Petitioners Versus Haji UMMAT KHAN — Respondent
Court: