Transfer of Evacuee House
Transfer of Evacuee House legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
In view of a prior family arrangement having been acted upon and widow having remained in continuous possession of said house in dispute, Settlement authorities found her entitled to transfer of entire house
Claims of appellant that there was no prior family arrangement, that he was original allottee and that widow was living as a mere licensee, not established
Finding of fact recorded by Settlement authorities with regard to actual
Order of Settlement Commissioner holding that shop could not be transferred to appellant whose L.S. Form stood rejected and order of High Court maintaining same set aside
Case remanded to Notified Officer for disposal afresh in accordance with law.
Appeal allowed in terms of agreed settlement.
Respondents, as such, stood better qualified for transfer of house - Petitioner for such reason not seriously pursuing matter but filing appeal after seven years from date of order of transfer to respondents-Petitioner even if supposed to have filed some ,form of allotment, his conduct in not pursuing same for seven long years enough for High Court to hold that case could not be reopened after such a late stage when in meantime many development took place and P. T. D. issued to respondents
Appeal even from issue of S. 30 notice belated by nine months-High Court, held, perfectly justified in holding that after issue of P. T. D. case no longer fit for being reopened particularly when petitioner
S. 2(6) read with Ministry of Works and Rehabilitation Notification No. F. 3(3)/60-SI, dated 3-8-1960-Transfer of evacuee house Possession-Person in order to avail of benefit of extension of period beyond 20-12-1958 as envisaged by notification must be shown to have-been in undisputed occupation of property claimed-Allotment in favour of claimant having been for a period of few months only and competent authority entitled to allot house to other persons, claimant could not be deemed to have been in undisputed occupation-of claimant having remained in occupation of house throughout of no consequence in view of his occupation being illegal, being in breach of condition of allotment requiring such person to hand over possession to Settlement Authority on expiry of period of allotment.
"Transfer of Evacuee House", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15273
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Transfer of Evacuee House"
1976 S C M R 463
Syed MANZOOR HUSSAIN GHAZI‑‑Petitioner Versus Syed IJAZ HUSSAIN SHAH AND OTHERS‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑ Sched., Part 1‑Transfer of evacuee house‑Questions whether a particular, person was or was not predecessor in interest of certain respondents and brother of another respondent‑Questions of fact Such questions to be decided by statutory authorities concerned an basis of evidence produced before them‑Questions answered in respondents' favour by authorities concerned on basis of available evidence and High Court satisfied with such finding‑‑Supreme Court, held, would not interfere with such findings.‑Question of fact.1988 S C M R 993
MUHAMMAD BASHIR‑‑Petitioner Versus Syed RIAZ HUSSAIN and others‑‑Respondents
Court: High Court1975 S C M R 327
NAZIR AHMAD-Appellant Versus Mst. SULTANA BIBI AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: High Court1981 S C M R 717
Mst. MEHRAJ BEGUM alias Mst. MAJAN AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus SETTLEMENT & REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER
Court: High Court1984 S C M R 520
Syed AKHTAR ABBAS‑Petitioner Versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: High Court1972 S C M R 669
CAPT. SAEED GUL BADSHAH AND ANOTHER Appellants Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, PESHAWAR
Court: High Court1975 S C M R 225
NAZIR AHMAD, INSPECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE — Appellant Versus Mst. SULTANA BIBI and ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: High Court1985 S C M R 1223(1)
Mst. RUQAYYA BEGUM‑‑Petitioner Versus ALTAF QUTAB and others‑‑Respondents
Court: High Court1988 S C M R 1807
MAHMOOD ULLAH and another — Petitioners Versus THE ADMINISTRATOR (RESIDUAL PROPERTIES, LAHORE
Court: High Court1984 S C M R 457
Mst. NAZNIN FATIMA AND OTHERS — Appellants Versus Syed HUSSAIN AHMED SHAH AND OTHERS — Respondents
Court: High Court