Principle of Maxim
Principle of Maxim legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Ss. 148, 302 & 307 read with S. 149-[Murder case]-Prosecution eye-witnesses though related to deceased yet not having any reason to implicate accused appellant falsely and attribute to him fatal spear blow-One of prosecution witnesses also bearing injuries received in course of same incident-Occurrence having taken place in broad daylight witness had full opportunity of observing whole incident Nothing brought on record to show witness having indulged in any exaggeration-Mere fact of site plan showing two points between which deceased dragged after occurrence and witnesses having deposed deceased being lifted by assailants and not dragged, held, no real contradiction-Word "dragged" used by draftsman need not be taken in literal sense and could cover act of carrying deceased from one point to another-Accused appellant, held, rightly convicted.
"Principle of Maxim", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15275
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Principle of Maxim"
1981 C L C 392
Ch. KHUSHI MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER
Court: LahoreP L D 1995 Peshawar 22
Mst. QAISRA ELIAHI ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus HAZARA (HILL TRACT) IMPROVEMENT TRUST through
Court: ‑‑‑‑Art.199‑‑‑Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S.54‑‑‑Natural justice, principles of‑‑‑Maxim "Audi alteram partem"‑‑‑Order passed in violation of the maxim "audi. alteram partem" (nobody to be condemned unheard) would be a nullity‑‑‑Maxim "audi alteram partem", embodies well‑founded principle of law and even if it was not expressly provided in any statute or rule, it has to be read into it so as to act fairly and justly with due regard to the principles of natural justice‑-‑Order in question, whereby land sold to petitioner was cancelled in violation of the principles of audi alteram partem was ab initio void and all subsequent actions taken in pursuance thereof would also be void and without any legal basis: ‑‑Natural justice, principles of‑‑Maxim.P L D 1991 Lahore 268
THE STATE — Appellant Versus NAVID ASIF and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1981 C L C 1356
Syed ALI ASGHAR ZAIDl‑Petitioner Versus BOARD OF REVENUE, SIND, HYDERABAD AND 2 others — Respondents
Court: Karachi1996 M L D 1913
NISAR AHMED and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus Mst. UROOS FATIMA and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1981 C L C 1083
Before Zaffar Hussain Mirza, J Versus Mst. FATIMA BAI‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1981 C L C 1374
Syed ISHTIAQ ALI, ADVOCATE‑‑Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF SIND ANC 12 OTHERS ‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1985 M L D 154
MUHAMMAD and others — Petitioners Versus MOTALLI and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2011 Supreme Court 671
SINDH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION through Secretary and another — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1973 P L C 264
PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB AND ANOTHER Versus AMANAT ALI
Court: Lahore