Prosecution evidence
Prosecution evidence legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Evidence of prosecution could not be tested in depth at bail stage, and only tentative assessment was to be made.
Benefit of all such instances in prosecution evidence must go to the accused regardless of the fact whether accused had taken any such defence plea or not.
Law does not enjoin each and every witness to give names of all the members of raiding party in his examination-in-chief.
[Criminal trial].
S.497-Bail-Prosecution evidence-Cannot be sifted in minute details at stage of bail application-Case registered after a responsible inquiry held by Assistant Commissioner-Various abductees including females recovered from various places in different districts and such persons having their woeful tales to tell-Very difficult at stage of bail to state all evidence direct or circumstantial against petitioner being false-Petitioner having ample opportunity to demonstrate his point of view during trial-No fundamental error of law or violation of any principle relevant for administration of justice in criminal cases warranting interference in discretionary order of High Court pointed out and High Court passing order by keeping overall facts and circumstances of case in view-Interference declined and petition dismissed-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3).
Prosecution evidence Prosecution evidence-Doubts in regard to-Cannot be resolved by mere assumptions regarding motives of witnesses
Benefit of such doubts must go to accused unless resolution possible with reference to other credible evidence or established circumstances.
"Prosecution evidence", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15295
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Prosecution evidence"
2015 Y L R 1592
The STATE through Police Station FIA, Gilgit — Appellant Versus AHMED ALI — Respondent
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court1992 S C M R 983
MUHAMMAD NAZIR‑‑‑Appellant Versus TARIQ and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2004 M L D 1080
RASHIDA PARVEEN‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1990 P L C 741
Malik MUHAMMAD MUKHTAR Versus MANAGER, DEHI MAZDOOR TRAINING CENTRE, RAWALPINDI and 2 others
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab1984 P L C 934
HABIB BANK LTD., BAHAWALPUR Versus IKRAM-UL-HAQ,
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab1982 P Cr
KHALI D-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: Lahore2018 Y L R 1777
SHAIR ALI SHAH — Petitioner Versus The STATE through Advocate General, Muzaffarabad and 4 others — Respondents
Court: Shariat Court (AJ&K)2015 Y L R 2614
MUHAMMAD NASEEM — Appellant Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court1996 S C M R 1368
SHAHID and 2 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan