Home Maxims & Terms Prosecution evidence meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Prosecution evidence

Prosecution evidence legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2014 YLR 2367 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 497Bail applicationProsecution evidenceAssessment ofScope

Evidence of prosecution could not be tested in depth at bail stage, and only tentative assessment was to be made.

2013 PCrLJ 701 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Appreciation of evidenceProsecution evidenceBenefit of favourable instancesScope

Benefit of all such instances in prosecution evidence must go to the accused regardless of the fact whether accused had taken any such defence plea or not.

2010 PCrLJ 157 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 4Prosecution evidence

Law does not enjoin each and every witness to give names of all the members of raiding party in his examination-in-chief.

1990 MLD 1588 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Prosecution evidenceProsecution of a person commences only when proceedings before a Court of law are initiated against him.

[Criminal trial].

1979 SCMR 112 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S.497-Bail-Prosecution evidence-Cannot be sifted in minute details at stage of bail application-Case registered after a responsible inquiry held by Assistant Commissioner-Various abductees including females recovered from various places in different districts and such persons having their woeful tales to tell-Very difficult at stage of bail to state all evidence direct or circumstantial against petitioner being false-Petitioner having ample opportunity to demonstrate his point of view during trial-No fundamental error of law or violation of any principle relevant for administration of justice in criminal cases warranting interference in discretionary order of High Court pointed out and High Court passing order by keeping overall facts and circumstances of case in view-Interference declined and petition dismissed-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3).

1954 PLD 197 FEDERAL-COURT-OF-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent

Prosecution evidence Prosecution evidence-Doubts in regard to-Cannot be resolved by mere assumptions regarding motives of witnesses

Benefit of such doubts must go to accused unless resolution possible with reference to other credible evidence or established circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Prosecution evidence", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15295

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Prosecution evidence"

YLR 2015
Cr. Appeal No.5 of 2013, decided on 2nd April, 2015.

2015 Y L R 1592

The STATE through Police Station FIA, Gilgit — Appellant Versus AHMED ALI — Respondent

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
SCMR 1992
Criminal Appeal No.101 of 1988, decided on 12th February, 1992.

1992 S C M R 983

MUHAMMAD NAZIR‑‑‑Appellant Versus TARIQ and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
MLD 2004
Criminal Appeal No.211 of 2004, decided on 10th February, 2004.

2004 M L D 1080

RASHIDA PARVEEN‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC 1990
Appeal No. RI‑91 of 1989/Pb., decided on 9th April, 1989.

1990 P L C 741

Malik MUHAMMAD MUKHTAR Versus MANAGER, DEHI MAZDOOR TRAINING CENTRE, RAWALPINDI and 2 others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PLC(CS) 1984
Appeal No. BR-649 of 1982, decided on 3rd July, 1983.

1984 P L C 934

HABIB BANK LTD., BAHAWALPUR Versus IKRAM-UL-HAQ,

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PCRLJ 2011
N/A

2011 P Cr

ALLAH DITTA — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1982
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3384/13 of 1981, decided on 20th Decem ber, 1981.

1982 P Cr

KHALI D-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2018
Criminal Revision Petition No.220 of 2017, decided on 22nd January, 2018.

2018 Y L R 1777

SHAIR ALI SHAH — Petitioner Versus The STATE through Advocate General, Muzaffarabad and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Shariat Court (AJ&K)
YLR 2015
Cr. Appeal No.3 of 2014, decided on 30th March, 2015.

2015 Y L R 2614

MUHAMMAD NASEEM — Appellant Versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
SCMR 1996
Criminal Appeal No. 173 of 1994, decided on 5th May, 1996.

1996 S C M R 1368

SHAHID and 2 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan