Prospectus for Admission to Medical College
Prospectus for Admission to Medical College legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Art. 185 (3) read with Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981), Art. 9-Prospectus for Admission to Medical College, r. 7 (f) (g) and Sind Permanent Residence Certificate Rules, 1971 - Educational institutions-Admission to M. B., B. S. against one of seats reserved for girl candidates of Karachi
Contention that Sind Permanent Residence Certificate Rules were ultra vires of Governor's power not raised before High Court-Held, cannot be raised before, nor examined by Supreme Court-.Petition for leave to appeal dismissed.
"Prospectus for Admission to Medical College", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15307
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Prospectus for Admission to Medical College"
1984 S C M R 260
YASMIN ANJUM-Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1998 Lahore 365
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Health, Government of the Punjab, Lahore and another — Appellants Versus IMRAN AHMAD KHAN — Respondent
Court: High Court1983 C L C 1819
AZAM KHAN‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. AND 3 OTHERS ‑Respondents
Court: Peshawar2000 Y L R 2280
Miss NASEERA HANAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ASSISTANT DIRECTOR‑GENERAL,
Court: Peshawarof Mr
ZARQA HAQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Secretary, Health, Quetta and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:2004 C L C 661
Syed FAIZ-UR-REHMAN — Petitioner Versus PRINCIPAL, SHEIKH ZAYED MEDICAL COLLEGE, RAHIMYAR KHAN and 4 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1993 Quetta 19
.RIAZ MUHAMMAD ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN, through Secretary
Court: Prospectus of Bolan Medical College for the Year 1990‑91, Art.---Reserved seats for doctors' children‑‑Categories prescribed for selection‑ Shifting from one category to another category‑‑Validity ‑‑‑ Where due to non availability of eligible candidates in any category, the seat falls vacant, then candidate from other category of doctors' children would be accommodated‑‑ Petitioner claiming seat in category 'B' having not qualified for the same, his seat had fallen vacant which could be given to eligible candidate by shifting him from the other category ‑‑‑ Petitioner by rejection of his candidature. would lose locus standi for challenging validity of admission granted to others.‑‑Locus standi.1992 C L C 1367
SARFRAZ AHMED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1987 C L C 1487
NAEEM MIRZA‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND through SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, SIND SECRETARIAT and 2 others‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1976 Karachi 1102
ABDUL QADIR BHATTI AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF SIND THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY of HEALTH, KARACHI AND ANOTHER‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑ Arts. 22(3)(b) & 25 read with Art. 260 (3)‑Admission to Medical College‑Allocation of seats to various communities including Ahmadi minority community according to their ratio in population‑Valid method for regulating admission to Medical Colleges‑Rule providing that minority applicants should not compete with applicants falling in another category‑Held, neither denial of admission only on ground of religion nor infringes Art. 2(3)(b).‑Educational institution.