Home Maxims & Terms Failure to do something meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Failure to do something

Failure to do something legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1990 CLC 1541 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases Expression "failure to do something'ConnotationFailure to do something imports element of negligence and default and means something more than a mere non-compliance

Cantonments Rent Restriction Act (XI of 1963), S.17 (9)].

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Failure to do something", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1531

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Failure to do something"

CLC 1990
First Rent Appeals Nos.385 and 386 of 1986, decided on 6th December, 1987.

1990 C L C 1541

Mst. KHURSHEED BEGUM‑‑‑Appellant Versus Haji MUHAMMAD ASGHAR and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
MLD 1988
First Rent Appeals Nos.385 and 386 of 1986, decided on 6th December; 1987.

1988 M L D 1018

Mst. KHURSHEED BEGUM‑‑Appellant Versus Haji MUHAMMAD ASGHAR through his Legal Heirs‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1954
Criminal Revision Case No. 80 of 1952, decided on 18th July, 1952.

P L D 1954 Dacca 175

Petitioners Versus THE CROWN‑Opposite Party

Court:
PTD 2016
I.T.A. No. 786/IB/2015, decided on 18th January, 2016.

2016 P T D (Trib

Messrs A&J ENGINEERING (PVT.) LTD. through CEO Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-I, RTO, RAWALPINDI

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal
SCMR 1984
Civil Appeal No. 209 of 1981, decided on 9th March, 1984.

1984 S C M R 940

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB KHAN‑Appellant Versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB AND OTHBRS Respondents

Court: ‑‑ Arts. 185(3) & 199‑Leave to appeal was granted to appellant to examine whether High Court was justified in dismissing constitutional petition filed by appellant on sole ground that petition suffered from laches notwithstanding fact that appellant was party to proceedings pending in Supreme Court concerning same cause which terminated only a month before institution of that constitutional petition. Laches.
SCMR 1980
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 994 of 1979, decided on 1st January, 1980.

1980 S C M R 608

QAMAR DIN-Petitioner Versus Mst. TALEH BEGUM-Respondent

Court: High Court
SCMR 1980
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 994 of 1979, decided on Ist January, 1980.

1980 S C M R 516

QAMAR DIN‑Petitioner Versus Mst. K. TALEH BEGUM‑‑Respondent

Court: ‑S. 13 (2) (vi)‑Ejectment‑Requirement for reconstruction‑Plea as to requirement of premises for reconstruction raised by land lord in his application for ejectment of tenant‑Held: Application could not be dismissed for not being accompanied with municipal authority's sanction for reconstruction of premises‑Necessary sanction having been obtained later during pendency of applica tion for ejectment and also brought on record of case, Rent Controller's order based on such sanction unexceptionable and tenant having had notice of plea of reconstruction not prejudiced in his defence‑Aziz Begum v. Guarantee Life and Employment Insurance P L D 1975 Lah. 594 overruled.
CLC 1988
First Regular Appeal No.505 of 1987, decided on 30th May, 1988.

1988K428

MADRASSA MAZHARUL ULOOM ASSOCIATION REGISTERED‑‑Appellant Versus ABDUL MAJEED‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PTD 2019
N/A

2019 P T D 878

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, IBD. Versus Messrs HI-TECH PLASTIC (PVT.) LTD.

Court: Islamabad High Court
PLC 1987
Writ Petition No.4162 of 1983, decided on 12th October, 1986. .

1987 P L C 787

MUHAMMAD ATTIQUE WARSI Versus THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KAKAKHAIL INDUSTRIES and others

Court: Lahore High Court