Home Maxims & Terms District Office Manual meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

District Office Manual

District Office Manual legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1984 SCMR 957 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Para. 3.5-West Pakistan Revenue Department District Ministerial Service Rules, 1964, rr. 2(i), 5(8), 11 & Appendix-Apprentice junior clerk enlisted in accordance with para. 3.5, District Office Manual and having been given occasional chances to work as junior clerk (for seven years) as and when a post of junior clerk was available in District Administration-District Administration making certain appointments of junior clerks from outside the list maintained under para. 3.5 of District Office Manual-Provisions of para. 3.5, District Office Manual were not inconsistent with provisions of West Pakistan Revenue Department District Ministerial Service Rules, 1964-No repugnancy or inconsistency having been found between the two-With enforcement of Ministerial Rules of 1964, both prepared under para. 3.5 of District Office Manual did not stand repealed or revoked

Apprentice junior clerk had therefore, right under para. 3.5, District Office Manual to be appointed to any vacancy occurring in group of junior clerk

1968 PLD 1194 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

District Office Manual 1960, rr. 1 & 2, 3.6 & 3.14 and Appendix 3, Chapter Ill-Appellate Jurisdiction of Commissioner-Commissioner has no right of interference with working of office of Deputy Commissioner-Deputy Commissioner solely responsible to maintain his office properly and efficiently Commissioner has no appellate power against order of Deputy Commissioner under r. 3.6 promoting members of his establishment to selection posts as defined in r. 3.14-Persons affected on promotion of others by Deputy Commissioner to selection posts Not given, by law, status of aggrieved persons-Such persons have no right of appeal to Commissioner; they can, however, make representation to Financial Commissioner (Now Board of Revenue)-Appeal is a statutory remedy provided by law or rules made there under-No power of appeal inherent in Commissioner against every order of Deputy Commissioner in absence of express provision in law.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "District Office Manual", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15335

Precedents & Case Laws citing "District Office Manual"

SCMR 1984
Civil Appeal No. 340 of 1981, decided on 26th May, 1984.

1984 S C M R 957

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD BASHIR‑Respondent

Court: ---Art. 185(3)‑West Pakistan Revenue Department District Ministerial Service Rules, 1964, rr. 2 (i), 5(8), 11 & Appendix---District Office Manual, para. 3.5‑Leave to appeal granted to examine question of law whether on enforcement of West Pakistan Revenue Department District Ministerial Service Rules, 1964, provisions of para. 3.5, District Office Manual ceased to have effect and stood repeal by necessary implication.‑Civil service.
PLD 1968
Letters Patent Appeal No. 336 of 1961, decided on 22nd April 1968.

P L D 1968 Lahore 1194

PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN‑Appellant Versus Syed SHABBIR JAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1990
Civil Appeal No.372 of 1987, decided on 7th November, 1989.

PLD 1990 Supreme Court 90

Present: Shafiur Rahma, Saad Saood Jan, Ali Hussain Qazilbash and Naimuddin, JJ Versus Civil Appeal No.372 of 1987, decided on 7th November, 1989.

Court:
PLD 1959
Writ Petition No. 284 of 1958 and other writ petitions decided on 3rd November, 1958.

P L D 1959 (W

Malik MUHAMMAD KHALIL‑ — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN etc. — Respondents

Court:
PLC(CS) 1971
Case No. 172/52 of 970, decided on 9th April 1971.

1971 P L C 158[C

GHLLAM HASAN AND 20 OTHERS Versus THE COMMISSIONER,MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN

Court: 1971 P L C 158C.S.T.
PLD 1962
Writ Petition No. 891 of 1958, decided on 31st October, 1961.

P L D 1962 (W

YUSUF KHAN‑Petitioner Versus THE INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF POLICE, KARACHI‑Respondent

Court:
YLR 2001
Civil Appeal No. 139 of 2000, decided on 21st December, 2000.

2001 Y R 3261

AJ&K GOVERNMENT and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus GHULAM RASOOL LOON and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K
CLC 2025
2021-August-13

2025 C L C 1585

NADEEM ABBAS and others — Petitioners Versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER, ICT, ISLAMABAD and others — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
MLD 1993
W.P. No.24 of 1993/(BWP), decided on 20th January, 1993.

1993 M L D 1048

MUKHTAR AHMED — Petitioner Versus THE MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC(CS) 2012
Writ Petitions Nos.11146 and 11289 of 2012, decided on 12th September, 2012.

2012 PLC (C

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN and others Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others

Court: Lahore High Court