Settlement Scheme (Revised) No. VII
Settlement Scheme (Revised) No. VII legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
S. 2 (12) read with Settlement Scheme No. VII (Revised), paras. 3 (3) (a) & 4-Transfer of rural building-Disputed property consisting of two shops in occupation of respondents and residential unit at rear of building and on top of shops-Entitlement of occupants of such building to be determined in accordance with general principles of Act and relevant Schemes thereunder Transfer of entire structure of building vertically to transferee of shop on ground floor-Held, just and proper in circumstances of case.
"Settlement Scheme (Revised) No. VII", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15388
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Settlement Scheme (Revised) No. VII"
P L D 1989 Supreme Court 580
Malik MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ KHAN TIWANA, ADVOCATE‑‑Appellant Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER (INDUSTRIES), LAHORE and others‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑S. 2(13)‑‑Settlement Scheme (Revised) No.VII‑‑Term "extended area"‑‑Meaning‑‑Land on which house was situated was included for the first time within the Municipal limits on 16‑4‑1966; and in regard to the disposal of said house Settlement Authorities had no jurisdiction for its disposal as it was not within the urban limits as on 14‑8‑1947 within the meaning of S.2(13)‑‑Petitioner was in the occupation of the property since 1947 and he had applied for its transfer on an LH Form in 1966‑‑Settlement Authority thus could not consider the entitlement of petitioner for transfer of the said property.‑‑Words and phrases.1986 M L D 731
AMIR ABDULLAH KHAN — Petitioner Versus DEPUTY SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER — Respondent
Court: Lahore1991 M L D 941
ATTAULLAH KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus SAMIULLAH KHAN and others — Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 1982 Lahore 69
GHULAM ALI AND OTHERS‑‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1980 Quetta 47
Syed HADI HUSSAIN SHAH-Applicant Versus MALIK SHAH AND 3 others-Respondents
Court:1977 S C M R 345
IMAM DIN‑Appellant Versus SETTLEMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER
Court: High Court1981 SCMR 645
SAQLAIN-Petitioner Versus Mst. HAZRA BEGUM AND 2 OTHERS — Respondents
Court: -- S. 2(4), Sched. read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199-Divisibility of house-Question whether property consisted of one house or two houses-A question of fact within exclusive jurisdiction of Settlement authorities-High Court, held, would not have been justified in writ petition to interfere with Settlement authority's finding as to house in question being not a separate house.--Question of fact-Jurisdiction.2005 S C M R 1881
Subedar GUL MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus MIAN MUHAMMAD through L.Rs. — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1983 S C M R 1055
MUHAMMAD FAZIL-Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS — Respondents
Court: High Court1980 S C M R 191
ATTAULLAH AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus PUNJAB PROVINCE AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: --- Chap. V, para. 4 read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)-Leave to appeal to Supreme Court-Cleavage of opinion existing in High Court about date on which rural buildings stood trans ferred to occupants under Scheme No. VII-Leave to appeal granted to resolve such cleavage of opinion.-Leave to appeal.