Home Maxims & Terms Increment meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Increment

Increment legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2009 PLC(CS) 260 FEDERAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL Judicial Precedent
Increment

When a civil servant reached the maximum of a pay scale and got promotion in the same scale, he could not get any increment

Grant of increment would mean crossing the maximum of that scale.

1999 PLC(CS) 641 SERVICE-TRIBUNAL-SINDH Judicial Precedent
IncrementWithdrawal

Two advance increments earlier granted to civil servant, were ordered to be withdrawn with retrospective effect after about 7 years and amount of such increments received by civil servant were also ordered to be recovered from him

Increments were ordered to be withdrawn on allegation that civil servant had concealed fact of grant -of honorarium equal to one month's salary during grant of two advance increments

No bar under Rules of Department existed to the effect that a second award could not be given to an official

Recovery of amount of two increments from civil servant also could not be made after seven years because if recovery proceedings were not made within a period of three years, recovery would be time-barred and non-enforceable at law

Order withdrawing two increments earlier granted to civil servant and recovery of amount was set aside in circumstances.

1997 PLC(CS) 118 SERVICE-TRIBUNAL-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent
IncrementEntitlement

Civil servant was allowed one increment on account of his having acquired additional educational qualification over and above the minimum requirement as prescribed for the post

Later on when by a notification two increments were allowed for each additional educational qualifications civil servant who had acquired additional qualifications prayed for four increments

Authority not only denied such increments to civil servant, but even recalled one increment earlier allowed to him on account of his acquiring additional qualification and over-payment was recovered because of certain change occurred in the policy

Held, civil servant who had acquired higher qualifications whereas his job requirement was lesser was rightly given one increment and by latter notification according to which two increments were allowed for each additional educational qualification was entitled to four increments

Civil servant therefore, could not be denied that right on ground of subsequent change in policy as a vested right already created could not be divested by any subsequent change in law or policy

Any executive fiat would always be prospective in operation and not retrospective

Order according to which earlier increment was recalled, was set aside, recovery from civil servant was held illegal and void and civil servant was also held entitled to get two increments for additional qualification from date. he passed the examination for that qualification.

1963 PLC 1107 Judicial Precedent

Increment Increment - Stoppage of, for misconduct - Employing concern governed by Ordinance III of 1960-No show-cause notice necessary-Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders), Ordinance (III of 1960).

1962 PLC 953 Judicial Precedent

Increment Arbitrary - Practice, held, undesirable.

1962 PLC 551 Judicial Precedent

Increment Increment-Rise in cost of living-Rise in pay-scale of lower categories of workers ordered.

1962 PLC 762 Judicial Precedent

Increment Increment-Claim for revision of pay-scale-Initial onus lies on workers to prove that existing pay-scale is lower than that in other comparable concerns or that it is not commensurate with increase in cost of living.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Increment", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15396

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Increment"

PLC(CS)N 2018
W.P. No.2585-P of 2014 with I.R., decided on 4th April, 2017.

2018 P L C (C

Dr. HABIB-UR-REHMAN Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA and 3 others

Court: Peshawar High Court
SCMR 1981
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1104 of 1979, decided on 21st March 1981.

1981 S C M R 460

TILE PROVINCE OF PUNJAB-Petitioner Versus SHABBIR HUSSAIN-Respondent

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 1980
Appeal No. 254 of 1979, decided on 25th October, 1979.

P L C 1980 (C

SHABBIR HUSSAIN Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLC(CS) 2005
Appeals Nos. 182, 183 and 185 of 2004, decided on 19th May, 2004.

2005 P L C (C

HAQ NAWAZ and 2 others Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, LAHORE and 2 others

Court: Punjab Service Tribunal
SCMR 2004
Civil Appeal No. 497 of 1999, decided on 30th September, 2003.

2004 S C M R 309

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through The Chief Engineer, Highway Department and others — Appellants Versus PERVAIZ IQAAL — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2004
Civil Appeal No. 497 of 1999, decided on 30th September, 2003.

2004 P L C (C

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through the Chief Engineer, Highway Department and others Versus PERVAIZ IQBAL.

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 2020
W.P. No.3364 of 2013, decided on 17th January, 2020.

2020 P L C (C

AKHTAR HUSSAIN SHAH Versus OIL AND GAS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED through Managing Director/Chief Executive and another

Court: Islamabad High Court
PLC(CS) 2024
Civil Appeal No. 512 of 2021, decided on 20th November, 2023.

2024 P L C (C

SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS and others Versus MUHAMMAD PERVAIZ

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2024
Civil Appeal No. 512 of 2021, decided on 20th November, 2023.

2024 S C M R 581

SENIOR GENERAL MANAGER, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS and others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD PERVAIZ — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC(CS) 1997
Appeal No. 222 of 1993, decided on 30th January, 1996.

1997 P L C (C

AQEEL ASSAM Versus PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT VOCATIONAL INSTITUTE, MULTAN and others

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab