Home Maxims & Terms Satisfied meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Satisfied

Satisfied legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1996 CLC 293 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases "Satisfied"

Connotation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Satisfied", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1546

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Satisfied"

PTD 1999
Civil Miscellaneous Writ Petition No.718 of 1996, decided on 17th October, 1996.

1999 P T D 2751

Smt. MOHINDER KAUR Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER and others

Court: 228 I T R 545
PLD 1964
Revision No. 1261 of 1962‑63, decided on 3rd October 1963, District Sukkur Daryakhurdi right (District Sukkur) Grant of land Disposal of katcha land‑Khatedars having daryakhurdi rights to be given preference after satisfying demands of Forest Depart ment.

P L D 1964 W

ALI NAWAZ‑ — Petitioner Versus JAN MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER‑ — Respondents

Court:
CLC 1991
Civil Revision No.397 of 1990, decided on 10th December, 1990.

1991 C L C 563

PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Works, Islamabad ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus Mrs. KHALID NAZIR ‑‑‑ Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLD 2002
E.F.A. No.82 of 2001, decided on 22nd January, 2002.

2002 C L D 623

Mirza SHAHID BRIG‑‑‑Appellant Versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN and

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1972
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 2-P of 1972, decided on 20th December 1972.

1972 S C M R 562

SARGHAN SHAH AND OTHERS-Petitioners Versus JAFFAR KHAN AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1987
Criminal Revision No. 2 of 1986, decided on 2nd April, 1987.

1987 P Cr

MUHAMMAD SARWAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus Sub. (Retd.) MUHAMMAD ASHRAF KHAN — Non-Petitioner

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
PLD 1970
Writ Petition No. 25 of 1967, decided on 8th August 1968.

P L D 1970 Dacca 422

FARID AHMED‑-Petitioner Versus THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (GENL.), DACCA AND 2 OTHERS‑-Respondents

Court:
PLD 2015
2013-December-9

P L D 2015 Lahore 384

Mst. FEROZA BEGUM — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COLLECTOR and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1951
Criminal Appeal No. 3 of 1950, decided on 29th January, 1951.

P

MUHAMMAD HAYAT‑ — Appellant Versus CROWN — ‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1969
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2212 of 1968, decided on 3rd. June 1968.

P L D 1969 Lahore 438

BEGUM AGHA ABDUL KARIM SHORISH KASH M IRI‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: S. 3(2), cl. (x) as amended by Defence of Pakistan (Amendment) Ordi nance (11 of 1968) and Defence of Pakistan Rules, 1965, r. 32 Preventive detention‑"Opinion" of authority empowered to act under Rules‑Must be based on some material to satisfy Court' that he had acted in a reasonable manner‑Powers of High Court under Art. 98(2)(b), Constitution of Pakistan (1962)‑Untrammelled" by limitations placed on Court by amendment of clause (x),. subsection (2) of S. 3‑Mere subjective satisfaction of detaining authority‑Not sufficient for formulation of "opinion" as to necessity of detention ‑ Constitution of Pakistan (1962),. Art. 98(2)(b) and Art. 6, Fundamental Right No. 2.