Entertain
Entertain legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meanings.
"Entertain" cannot be termed as entertainment by office of Court but would involve due process of application of judicial mind to matter in question
Court office was obliged to receive appeal and to raise necessary objections if not accompanied with due notice etc. but whether to entertain appeal or throw it out must still remain in the domain of Judges who would, in normal course, come to be seized of an individual case.
Meaning.
"Entertain" means "to admit to consideration".
"Entertain", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1554
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Entertain"
P L D 2004 Lahore 351
Messrs METROPOLE CINEMA PVT. LTD. through Managing Director and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Excise and Taxation Department, Lahore and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2004 Lahore 73
PARKS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus D.G. EXCISE AND TAXATION — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 2021 Sindh 306
ABDULLAH RAFI — Plaintiff Versus DIRECTOR, PROPERTY AND ENTERTAINMENT TAX, EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT, KARACHI and 3 others — Defendants
Court: High Court2021 P T D 1118
ABDULLAH RAFI Versus DIRECTOR, PROPERTY AND ENTERTAINMENT TAX, EXCISE AND TAXATION DEPARTMENT, KARACHI and 3 others
Court: Sindh High CourtP L D 1991 Supreme Court 870
GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN and others ‑‑‑ Appellants Versus Messrs JABEES LIMITED ‑‑‑ Respondent
Court:1979 C L C 784
MESSRS JABEES LTD., KARACHI-Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN THROUGH MEMBER,
Court: Karachi1994 C L C 1034
PARKS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DIRECTOR, EXCISE AND TAXATION and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2006 SCMR 1782
Messrs PARKS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. — Appellant Versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL EXCISE AND TAXATION, LAHORE and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1976 Karachi 712
MESSRS NISHAT TALKIES AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus THE DIRECTOR/COLLECTOR, EXCISE AND TAXATION, KARACHI AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: S. 60‑Entertainment duty, imposition and collection of‑Whether Cantonment Boards, with requisite previous sanction of Federal Government, competent to impose entertainment duty Quaere.1985 P T D 605
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, MADRAS Versus PRASAD PROCESS PRIVATE LTD.
Court: Madras High Court (India)