Home Maxims & Terms Seen meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Seen

Seen legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1989 PLC(CS) 715 SERVICE-TRIBUNAL-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesWords "seen" and "I see"Meaning and scopeIn official documents when word `seen' is written, it normally means that Authority has agreed to what has been put upBeneficial construction of document is a ruleDeprival interpretation requires explicit and express language

In common parlance when one says "I see" he means "I agree" and if he does not agree, he shows it either by gesture or says something to convey disagreement.

1989 PLC(CS) 650 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Seen"Meaning and construction

When word "seen" is written in official documents it normally means that the authority has agreed to what has been put up

Beneficial construction of document is a rule

Interpretation depriving a subject of his right requires explicit and express language

Where on a file it was noted that "Chief Minister has seen", that would mean that he had approved the same, otherwise he would have simply said no or rejected.

1959 PLD 210 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
" Mulahiza shud"-Means "seen"

Implies approval. M. Anwar and Malik Muhammad Akram, Advocates Supreme Court, instructed by Muhammad Tufail, Attorney for Appellant.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Seen", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15717

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Seen"

MLD 2003
N/A

2003 M L D 902

KHALID MASIH and others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2016
Criminal Appeals Nos. 209-L and 210-L of 2009, decided on 13th January, 2016.

2016 S C M R 2123

MUHAMMAD MUSHTAQ — Appellant Versus MUSTANSAR HUSSAIN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PCRLJN 2020
2019-November-12

2020 P Cr

MOHAMMAD IDRESS — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PCRLJN 2017
2016-December-31

2017 P Cr

AHMAD MIR ALIA (HUDA) and 2 others — Petitioners Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
SCMR 2007
Jail Shariat Petitions Nos.30, 57 and 56 of 2005, decided on 29th November, 2006.

2007 SCMR 778

BINYAMIN alias KHARI and others — Petitioners Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Shariat Appellate Jurisdiction
PLD 1991
Criminal Appeal No.86 of 1987, decided on 22nd April, 1991

P L D 1991 Supreme Court 718

GHULAM MUSTAFA alias ZIAU — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court:
YLR 2019
Criminal Appeal No.37 of 2018, decided on 1st April, 2019.

2019 Y L R 2281

The STATE — Appellant Versus RAJ DAD and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
PCRLJ 1982
Criminal Appeal No. 15 and Confirmation Case No. 2 of 1981, decided on 8th March, 1981.

1982 P Cr

WALI MUHAMMAD‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 2018
2018-September-10

P L D 2018 Supreme Court 813

MUHAMMAD ABID — Appellant Versus THE STATE and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 2009
2009-July-30

2009 P Cr

MUMTAZ — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi