Home Maxims & Terms Railway Establishment Code meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Railway Establishment Code

Railway Establishment Code legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1985 PLC(CS) 1056 FEDERAL-SERVICE-TRIBUNAL Judicial Precedent
Railway Establishment CodeEstablishment Division O.M. No. 1/2/75-ARC, dated 27-1-1975, para. 12 (b)Formation of Office Management GroupSeniority of Section Officers

Direct recruits appointed in 1977 on basis of Examination of Public Service Commission conducted in 1975 vis-a-vis ad hoc Section Officers inducted to O.M.G. on regular basis in 1977 on qualifying Examination of Public Service Commission

Provisions of Central Secretariat Service (Class I) Rules, 1965 not relevant

Seniority to be determined in accordance with paras. 12(b) (ii) a (iii) of O.M. No. 1/2/75-ARC, dated 27-1-1975

Officers promoted on regular basis in 1977 shall rank senior to those recruited in 1977

Seniority to count from commencement of service and year of clearing examination not relevant.

1983 PLC 822 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Ss. 7 (2) (b) & 15-Railway Establishment Code, r. 2044 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199-Deducted wages-Railway employee (clerk) - Order of transfer of employee from J to L malicious illegal and tended to destroy his seniority at placing him junior most in same category at L-Orders of transfer set aside by civil Court-Railway Authorities placing employee on leave due and allowing to draw salary accordingly-Railway Authorities making deduction from employee' wages by exercising power under rule 2044- Such power, held, not available to Authority, employee being never dismissed, removed or suspended-Deductions made as such, held, unauthorised apart from being contumacious and in violation of decree by civil Court-Deduction for absence from duty is one where absence of employee voluntary and not where employer prevents employee from performing his duty though employee willing to perform same-Employee not at fault being prevented by Railway Authorities to perform duty-Grant of compensation at four times wages matter within jurisdiction of Payment of Wages Authority and Appellate Labour Court not interfered with by High Court being neither illegal nor perverse but fully justified.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Railway Establishment Code", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15839

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Railway Establishment Code"

PLC 1997
Appeal No. SUK‑350 of 1996, decided on 30th May, 1996.

1997 P L C 457

RASHID KHAN Versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, SUKKUR and others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
PLC 1994
Writ Petition No.256 of 1989, decided on 19th February, 1994.

1994 P L C 383

PAKISTAN RAILWAYS Versus SAKHI MUHAMMAD and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 1966
Civil Revision Application No. 375 of 1962, decided on 16th May 1966.

P L D 1966 (W

KARACHI‑-Applicant Versus BASHIR AHMED‑ — Respondent

Court:
PLD 1994
Writ Petition No.256 of 1989, decided on 19th February, 1994.

P L D 1994 Lahore 338

PAKISTAN RAILWAYS‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SAKHI MUHAMMAD and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
SCMR 1988
Civil Petition No.183-R of 1987, decided on 29th June, 1988.

1988 S C M R 1760

PAKISTAN RAILWAYS — Petitioner Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR

Court: High Court
SCMR 1987
Civil Appeal No. K‑14 of 1982, decided on 31st August, 1986.

1987 S C M R 638

CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN RAILWAY BOARD, LAHORE‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD ALI‑‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1963
Civil Appeal No. 32 of 1959, decided on 11th November 1959,

P L D 1963 Supreme Court 268

GHULAM MUSTAFA SHAH‑ — Appellant Versus PAKISTAN AND OTHERS — ‑Respondents

Court:
SCMR 1993
Civil Appeal No.234 of 1988, decided on 8th June, 1991.

1993 S C M R 258

PAKISTAN RAILWAYS through the Divisional Superintendent, Railways, Multan‑‑‑Appellant Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1967
Petition No. 580 of 1965, decided on 22nd June 1966.

P L D 1967 Dacca 648

M. H. JOARDAR‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS Respondents

Court:
PLC 1993
Civil Appeal No.234 of 1988, decided on 8th June, 1991.

1993 P L C 593

Multan Versus PRESIDING OFFICER, PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan