Seaman
Seaman legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Petitioner was a registered Trade Union of working seamen who worked as such and held valid continuous discharge certificate
Respondents who were also registered Trade Unions of working seamen, holding continuous discharge certificates, moved an application to Registrar, Trade Unions for holding secret ballot for election of Collective Bargaining Agent under provisions of S. 22 Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969
In response to notice given by Registrar Trade Unions calling upon registered Trade Unions to indicate their desire they wanted to contest secret ballot for determination of Collective Bargaining Agent, petitioner as also other respondents expressed their desire and proceedings for determination of Collective Bargaining Agent were pending Petitioner Union as also other respondents challenged competency of Registrar to ask for holding a referendum for determination of Collective Bargaining Agent
Petitioner's contention was that seamen who had valid discharge certificate were not employed in the establishment who were actually engage and employed on ship
Registrar by his impugned order disposed of this and several other points raised and decided to prepare list of voters who would be entitled to cast their votes in the referendum
Provisions of Merchant Shipping Act, 1923 and Rules framed thereunder made it clear that. "Seamen" meant ever person employed or engaged in any capacity on board any ship
Held, since expression "seamen" as defined by S. 2(8) of Merchant Shipping Act was confined only to those who were employed or engaged in any capacity on board any ship Trade Unions which held valid Continuous Discharge Certificate and were no engaged in any capacity on board any ship could not be considered in the establishment
Order of Registrar disposing of objections and points raised and deciding to prepare list of voters, entitling them to cast their votes in the referendum was declared to be without lawful authority and of no legal effect and Registrar was directed to consider whether seamen in trade union had beer employed o- engaged on board any ship or not.
"Seaman", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15853
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Seaman"
1991 P L C 186
PAKISTAN SEAMEN'S UNION Versus THE REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, SINDH and 13 others
Court: Karachi High CourtP L D 2002 Karachi 395
SIKANDAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus CIT GROUP/CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FINANCING INC.‑‑‑Respondent
Court:1999 C L C 996
SIKANDAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus M.T. EASTERN NAVIGATER and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi1989 C L C 588
MARINE ENGINEERS' ASSOCIATION OF PAKISTAN‑‑Petitioner Versus SHIPPING MASTER, GOVERNMENT OF SHIPPING OFFICE,
Court: Karachi1986 C L C 998
ILIADIS IOAMMIS‑‑Plaintiff Versus M.V. QUEEN VASSILIKI‑11 and others‑‑Defendants
Court: KarachiP L D 1989 Karachi 65
INHAM REFRIGERATION b.v. — Plaintiff Versus The OWNERS OF "F.T.PARIVASH" and "TRANSOCEAN HOLDINGS LTD." — Defendants
Court: ---S. 4(4)--Admiralty jurisdiction--Term 'Wages'--Meaning, scope and import of--Where a seaman was entitled to receive any amount or benefit which could be translated into money on account of his services as a seaman, same would be covered by the definition of 'wages' and could be the subject-matter of an Admiralty suit under Ordinance XLII of 1980--Plaintiff, however, in such suit should be either the seaman himself or his authorised agent--Where in suit 'A' the decree prima facie was not for wages by a seaman or by his authorised agent on his behalf, such plaintiff could not have priority over the plaintiff in suit 'B'--Decrees in other suit relating to supplies of necessaries etc. would come after the decree of plaintiff in suit 'B' in priority, the latter being mortgagee of the vessel--Priority in other cases would be, firstly, the decrees on account of wages, secondly, decrees on account of Master's wages and disbursement if any, thirdly, decree on mortgages, fourthly. necessaries and repairs and lastly ordinary decrees.--Words and phrases.1980 C L C 80
CARLITO M. DALAC-Plaintiff Versus M. v. `ASIAN QUEEN' THROUGH ITS MASTER/CAPTAIN,
Court: KarachiP L D 1993 Karachi 656
MUHAMMAD AMJAD ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and others ‑‑‑ Respondents
Court:2005 P L C 175
M/s. OVERSEAS MARINE TRADING AGENCIES (PVT.) LTD. and others Versus THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES OLD-AGE BENEFITS INSTITUTION and another
Court: Karachi High Court1978K199
M. H. JAN MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus SECOND SIND LABOUR COURT, KARACHI AND 3 others — ‑Respondents
Court: