Home Maxims & Terms Dispossession meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Dispossession

Dispossession legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1999 MLD 1413 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesWords "possession" and "dispossession"

Meaning and import.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Dispossession", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15944

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Dispossession"

CLC 1990
Civil Revision No. 1918 of 1989, decided on 7th November, 1989.

1990 C L C 268

GHULAM NABI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 2011
N/A

2011 P Cr

GULFAM AHMED — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, GUJRANWALA and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2010
Criminal Revision No. S-108 of 2007, decided on 2nd March, 2010.

2010 Y L R 1982

ALI RAZA — Applicant Versus Haji MUHAMMAD and others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
SCMR 2016
Criminal Appeal No. 04-K of 2012, decided on 22nd July, 2016.

2016 S C M R 1931

Shaikh MUHAMMAD NASEEM — Appellant Versus Mst. FARIDA GUL — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2008
2008-April-29

P L D 2008 Karachi 369

JALAL and 11 others — Applicants Versus KAPRI KHAN and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
MLD 2010
2010-June-18

2010 M L D 1920

MUHAMMAD ALI — Applicant Versus ABDUL HAQ and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 2012
2012-May-18

P L D 2012 Sindh 399

JAM SUHNAL and another — Applicants Versus MUHAMMAD AQIL and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2007
2007-January-19

P L D 2007 Lahore 231

ZAHOOR AHMAD and 5 others-Petitioners Versus THE STATE and 3 others-Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1979
Civil Petition No. 632 of 1976, decided on 28th October 1978.

P L D 1979 Lahore 215

MUNNAWWAR HUSSAIN AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus REHMAT ALI-Respondent

Court: -,.- O. XXI, r. 100 read with S. 151-Execution of decree-Dispossession of purchaser by decree-holder-Expression "is dispossessed" in r. 100 clearly indicates person being already dispossessed and does not cover case !~f person yet to be dispossessed-Rule 100 not applicable unless applicant actually dispossessed-inherent jurisdiction of Court under s. 151, held, cannot be invoked to circumvent express provision of r. 100.-Words and phrases.
PCRLJ 2007
2007-March-15

2007 P Cr

ABDUL HAQ and 6 others — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, LODHRAN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore