Appurtenant
Appurtenant legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meaning.
"Appurtenant", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15952
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Appurtenant"
1999 P T D 2480
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus M. ICALPAGAM
Court: 227 I T R 7332000 P T D 587
M. RAMALAKSHMI REDDI Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
Court: 232 I T R 2812024 C L C 1569
Syed QAMAR MEHDI — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1998 P T D 2303
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Versus SHAMATILAL POPATLAL (HUF)
Court: 225 I T R 242P L D 1967 Lahore 375
MUHAMMAD ASLAM — Petitioner Versus THE CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, LAHORE AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court:1992 P T D 430
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus SARABHAI MANAGEMENT CORPORATION LTD.
Court: Supreme Court of India1968 S C M R 445
BEGUM SAMAD KHAN AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, KARACHI AND ANOTHER-Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1983 Supreme Court 143
MUHAMMAD BASHIR-Appellant Versus SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, LYALLPUR AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: -- S. 2 (4), Settlement Scheme No. I, para. 19 read with para. 1 (3) and Chief Settlement Commissioner's Memo. No. 301-P1/Reh/60, dated 19-t-1960, paras. 2(2), (3) & 3 (i) as modified by Instructions dated I1-3-1961-"House"-Definition-Transferee of house-Held, entitled to purchase only an area equal to three times plinth area of such house in accordance with prescribed procedure contained in valid and legal Instructions issued by Chief Settlement Commissioner-Held further, para. 19. read with para. 1 (3) of Settlement Scheme No. I was repugnant to provisions of Act-No interference with Order of Chief Settlement Commissioner as upheld by High Court called for.Words and phrases.P L D 1966 Supreme Court 719
ABDUL HAMID KHAN‑Appellant Versus (1) SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER,
Court: (b) Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), S.2(4) read with Government of Pakistan Memorandum No. F3(1)/60‑S1, dated 30‑7‑1962 and Chief Settle ment Commissioner's Press Note dated 22‑10‑1962‑"House" Person in possession of an out‑house or garage not considered to be "in occupation" thereof for purpose of transfer of "house"‑ Out houses, garage, appurtenant to "house''‑Excess area over three times plinth area‑Transfer in discretion of Settlement Authorities Party claiming only outhouses and excess area‑Claim finally rejected by Settlement Commissioner in Revision‑Party has no locus standi to object to transfer of excess area to party in possession of "house"‑ Mst. Fazalunnisa Begum v. The Chief Settlement Commissioner Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K‑34 9f 1966 rel.1990 M L D 420
JAI NARAIN‑‑Appellant Versus SRI RAM NARAIN by Legal Heirs and others‑‑Respondents
Court: Allahabad High Court (India)