Home Maxims & Terms Indifferent Service Record meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Indifferent Service Record

Indifferent Service Record legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1991 PLC(CS) 244 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Term

'indifferent service record" had been coined by the Authorities unmindful of the fact that it was too vague a term having no legal basis.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Indifferent Service Record", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/15959

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Indifferent Service Record"

PLC(CS) 1993
Writ Petition No. 8846(S) of 1991, decided on 22nd February, 1993.

1993 P L C (C

TAHIR MAHMOOD Versus INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE and another

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 1992
Appeal No. 23(Q) of 1988, decided on 8th December, 1991.

1992 P L C (C

Major (Retd.) MUHAMMAD FAZAL DURRANI Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and 5 others

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
SCMR 1991
Civil Petition No.343 of 1988, decided on 24th January, 1990.

1991 S C M R 1803

MUHAMMAD ZULFIQAR ALI KHAN — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1990
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 380‑R .of 1988, decided on 5th July, 1989.

1990 S C M R 364

Dr. SHER ZAMAN‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment

Court: ‑‑‑Art. 212(3)‑‑‑Seniority‑‑‑Promotion‑‑‑Leave to appeal was granted to consider, (a) whether Federal Service Tribunal did not appreciate the fact that a number of civil servants junior to petitioner civil servant, had been placed over the head of the petitioner in the seniority list prepared by Authority in violation of the orders of Service Tribunal; (b) whether the Authority had deliberately blocked the promotion of civil servant by misinterpreting the rules/instructions made by themselves and applying the same from retrospective effect to the disadvantage of civil servant and thus the law had been flouted, (c) whether the Authority had blocked the promotion of petitioner to the post of Joint Secretary on the basis of so‑called indifferent service record of civil servant who had to date not earned even a single adverse remark.‑‑Civil service.
PLD 1967
Writ Petition No. 1196 of 1965, decided on 5th May 1966.

P L D 1967 Lahore 566

ABDUL KHALIQ QURESHI-Petitioner Versus THE CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER, PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court:
PLC(CS) 1997
Appeal No. 571(R) of 1996, decided on 14th January, 1997.

1997 P L C (C

NASEER‑UD‑DIN HUMAYUN BUTT Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION ISLAMABAD and others

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC(CS) 1991
N/A

1991 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD EJAZ Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, HOME DEPARTMENT

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 1986
Petition No. LHR‑219 of 1985, decided on 24th July, 1985

1986 P L C 1138

TARIQ SAEED and 5 others Versus GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL TELECOMMUNICATION

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
PLC(CS) 1997
Writ Petition No. 106 of 1991, decided on 10th March, 1997.

1997 P L C (C

SHAH NAWAZ KHAN KUNDI through Legal Heirs Versus GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. through Chief Secretary, Peshawar and 2 others

Court: Peshawar High Court
PLC(CS) 1984
N/A

1984 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN Versus THE CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE AND 2 OTHERS

Court: Federal Service Commission