Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Action meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Action

Action legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1990 PLC 218 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 10 & 13Words and phrasesWord "action"Connotation

Provisions of S. 10 though contemplate the Registrar as the person on whose complaint the Labour Court can cancel the registration of a trade union, yet under S. 13(b), it also falls within the powers of Registrar to authorise any person to lodge a complaint with Labour Court for action which notably does not mean but includes prosecution against trade union, employees, workers etc.

Complaint by General Manager of Employer Company after duly receiving authorisation from the Registrar, Trade Unions in this behalf was competent.

1989 CLC 1825 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesTerms `suit', . `action' and "application"

Meanings and distinction elaborated.

1963 PLD 182 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Words and Phrases Words and Phrases-"Action"-Defined.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Action", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1612

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Action"

PLC(CS) 1984
Appeal No. 122 (K) of 1:982, decided on 10th May, 1984. ,

1984 P L C (C

ASADULLAH MEMON Versus WAPDA

Court: Service Tribunal Federal
PLD 1967
Civil Revision No. 106 of 1963, decided on 14th April 1967.

P L D 1967 Lahore 1074

Mst. RAHMAT BIBI-Petitioner Versus RAMZANI-Respondent

Court:
PLD 1968
Civil Revision No. 170 of 1960, decided on 1st May 1967.

P L D 1968 Lahore 509

FATEH MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus FIRM JAVED TRANSPORT SERVICE AND 5 OTHERS — Respondents

Court:
PLD 1993
R.F.A. No.121 of 1989, heard on 22nd December, 1992.

P L D 1993 Lahore 183

Mst. IQBAL BEGUM ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus I FAROOQ INAYAT and others ‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: 0. VII, R.11 ‑‑‑ Interpretation ‑‑‑ Provisions of O VII, R.11, C.P.C. are procedural and such provisions must not be read in isolation and, if intrinsic aid is afforded in their interpretation by other provisions of the Code, that aid must be made use of. p. 191 A
CLC 2005
Civil Appeal No.60 of 2003, decided on 3rd December, 2004.

2005 C L C 492

KHURSHID AHMAD‑‑‑Appellant Versus SULTAN HABIB and 50 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
CLD 2005
2004-March-30

2005 C L D 133

C.V. `LAMON BAY' and others — Appellants Versus SADRUDDIN and others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 2002
Civil Revision Application No. 194 of 1997, decided on 19th April, 2002.

P L D 2002 Karachi 408

SHAHEEM NASIR KHAN‑‑‑Applicant Versus Mst. ASMAT ARA and 6 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 2023
the basis of the compromise entered on 18.02.2000 between the parties and that the mothers of the petitioners appeared in person and got recorded their statements before the court. It was thus contended that the additional district judge was correct in applying the provisions of Order II, Rule 2

P L D 2023 Lahore 601

KAMILA AAMIR and another — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2025
2024-April-23

P L D 2025 Sindh 5

MUHAMMAD FARHAN WAZIR and others — Plaintiffs Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence and others — Defendants

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 1983
Appeal No. 109 (L) of 1976, decided on 27th February, 1983.

1983 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD SADIQUE KHAN Versus WAPDA

Court: Federal Service Tribunal

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library