Home Maxims & Terms Pakistan Television Code of Advertising Standards and Practice meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Pakistan Television Code of Advertising Standards and Practice

Pakistan Television Code of Advertising Standards and Practice legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1989 CLC 1989 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Pakistan Television Code of Advertising Standards and PracticeSs.19 & 20Commercial displayed on Pakistan TelevisionSuit arising in the background of such advertisement

Facts pertinent thereto cannot be agitated or established in isolation unless the person at whose instance advertisement has been carried, is identified and is a party to the proceedings

Question regarding misleading the viewers or conferring an artificial advantage upon the advertiser or substantiation of points of comparison etc. are matters which cannot be agitated against Pakistan Television, unless the latter has recourse to the relevant information of the party at whose instance the advertisement was displayed-Nexus between weight and quality of goods in question had to be explained by the plaintiff as the principal defendant was to show whether alleged material was capable of being used in the manufacture of goods to artificially increase its weight to cause deception as to quality

Such matters which cannot be urged or decided unless the principal, at whose instance the offending advertisement has been carried, is a party to the suit.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Pakistan Television Code of Advertising Standards and Practice", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1616

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Pakistan Television Code of Advertising Standards and Practice"

CLC 1989
Suit No.263 and Civil Miscellaneous Appeals Nos.1690, 2663 and 2664 of 1989, decided on 19th April, 1989.

1989 C L C 1989

DIAMOND RUBBER MILLS‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN TELEVISION COPRPORTION LTD. and 2 others‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi. .
CLD 2008
15-5-1975; (1929) 2 K.B. 331 case of Cassidy v. Daily Mirror Newspapers Ltd. decided by Court of Appeal on 13-5-1929; (1905) 1 Chancery Division 519 in case of Hanfstaengl v. W.H. Smith & Sons; Black Law Dictionary page 448 definition of Defamation; All ER (1941) 2 Page 403 in case of King Features Syndicate Inc. v. O. and M. Kleemann, Ltd.; Syed Muhammad Ali v. Network Television Marketing (Pvt.) Ltd. and another PLD 2005 Kar. 399; Adeeb Javedani v. Yahya Bakhtiar 1995 CLC 1246; Abdul Ghafoor v. Syed Jawed Hussain Jaffrey and another PLD 2006 Kar. 691; Eureka 'Forbes Limited, Kalkata v. Pentair Water India Private Limited 2006 Ind Law Kar. 505, decided on 20-12-2006; Dabur India' Limited v. Emami Limited 2004 Ind Law Del 162, decided on 28-5-2004 by Delhi High Court; Altaf Goher v. Wajid Shamsul Hussain PLD 1981 Kar. 515 and Unreported Judgment of Delhi High Court in I.A. No.5445 of 2004 titled as Dabur India Limited v. Colgate Palmolive India Ltd. decided on 9-9-2004 ref

2008 C L D 190

Messrs HUB PAK SALT REFINERY through Duly Authorized Partner — Plaintiff Versus NATIONAL FOODS (PVT.) LIMITED — Defendant

Court: Karachi
PLD 2016
2016-June-13

P L D 2016 Supreme Court 692

PAKISTAN BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION and others — Appellants Versus PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLD 2010
2009-September-29

2010 C L D 1478

File No.2(1) / Dir.(L)CCP / 2008) and File No.2(6) / Dir(L) / CCP/2008

Court: Competition Commission of Pakistan
PLD 2020
2020-March-16

P L D 2020 Islamabad 343

Messrs LABBAIK (PVT.) LTD. — Appellant Versus PAKISTAN ELECTRONIC MEDIA REGULATORY AUTHORITY through Chairman — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2013
2012-January-15

P L D 2013 Supreme Court 244

HAMID MIR and another — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2021
2020-November-11

2021 C L C 1184

ARY COMMUNICATION LTD. through Authorized Officer — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Information and Broadcasting and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLD 2018
2018-March-30

2018 C L D 844

F. No. 201/COMP/BATTERY MANUFACTURERS/OFT/CCP/2016

Court: Competition Commission of Pakistan
PLD 2019
2018-September-12

P L D 2019 Supreme Court 1

Suo Motu Case No.28 of 2018

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 2023
2007-May-7

2023 C L C 398

Messrs LABBAIK (PVT.) LTD. — Appellant Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh