Home Maxims & Terms Agent meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Agent

Agent legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1994 CLC 1516 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases "Aggregate"Meaning of

Aggregate" means a collection of things in order to form a whole.

1992 MLD 2536 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases

"Agent" includes a counsel.

1988 CLC 1381 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases'Agent', 'bailment', 'bailor', 'bailee', 'trust' and 'trustee'

Meaning.

1988 MLD 440 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases

Word "Agent' would imply a person, employed to do any act for another or represent another in dealing with third party.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Agent", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1659

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Agent"

PLD 1965
Criminal Revision No. 210 of 1964, decided on 12th October 1964.

P L D 1965 (W

HAIDAR KHAN-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court: National and Provincial Assemblies (First Election) Order President's Order No. 4 of 1962, Arts. 54 & 73-Interpretation of Art. 54-Candidate employing election agent-Election expenses return not filed by such agent within prescribed period-Agent and candidate both guilty of `illegal practice' within meaning of Art. 54 (4) and liable to punishment under Art. 73.
PLD 1973
Civil Revision No. 36 of 1970, decided on 26th October 1972.

P L D 1973 Lahore 670

GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN THROUGH COLLECTOR, MULTAN — ‑Petitioner Versus Mst. TAJ BEGUM‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1980
Regular Second Appeal No. 522 of 1970, decided on 4thJune, 1980.

P L D 1980 Peshawar 248

HABIB BANK LTD., PESHAWAR‑Appellant Versus MESSRS SANGEEN KHAN ABDUL JALIL AND 4 others — Respondents

Court:
PLD 1977
Suits Nos. 436 of 1975 and 168 of 1976, decided on 29th April 1977.

P L D 1977 Karachi 765

ALLIANCE INSURANCE Co. LTD.‑Plaintiff Versus BURJORJEE & Co., KARACHI AND 3 OTHERS‑Defendants

Court: ‑‑ R. 15 read with rr. 3(5) & 74‑Nature, scope and object of r. 15 Petition under r. 15, not an "'interlocutory application"‑Applicant, held, not needed to support such petition with an affidavit as required under r. 74‑Affidavit may. however. be filed for disclosing facts not already on record.‑Affidavit.
SCMR 2022
Civil Petition No. 1998 of 2018, decided on 2nd March, 2022.

2022 S C M R 1262

Syed ATIF RAZA SHAH — Petitioner Versus Syed FIDA HUSSAIN SHAH and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC 1989
Appeal No.Kar.10 and 18 of 1989, decided on 26th February, 1989.

1989 P L C 536

STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN CLASS IV EMPLOYEES' UNION Versus STATE BANK OF PAKISTAN and others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind
PTD 1969
Income‑tax Reference No. 13 of 1961, decided on 17th August 1962.

1969 P T D 280

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, BOMBAY CITY II Versus HIND COMMISSION AGENTS

Court: Bombay (India)
PTD 1994
ITA No. 263/KB of 1992-93, decided on 28th February, 1993.

1994 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2011
Complaints Nos.462-K to 469 of 2009, decided on 12th January, 2010.

2011 PTD 1266

Messrs MALIK PAPER MART, KARACHI Versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Court: Federal Tax Ombudsman
MLD 1986
First Appeal No.3 of 1978, decided on 26th August, 1986.

1986 M L D 2661

Messrs KUNDI SERVICES Ltd .‑‑Appellants. Versus THE UNITED BANK Ltd., KARACHI‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi