Home Maxims & Terms Duty meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Duty

Duty legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1994 CLC 2403 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases MaintenanceHusband should maintain his wife starting from the date of marriage

Such right could be enforced with regard to the period of matrimonial life.

1994 CLC 1903 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Words and Phrases Word "duty" connotes relationship between one person and another, imposing on the one an obligation, for the benefit of that other, to take reasonable care in all circumstances.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Duty", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1661

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Duty"

SCMR 2018
Civil Petitions Nos. 1812-L to 1815-L, 1962-L to 1970-L, 1981-L to 1983-L of 2017, decided on 22nd September, 2017.

2018 S C M R 1

Messrs ADVANCE TELECOM and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PTD 2016
Civil Appeal No. 1600 of 2006, decided on 4th January, 2016.

2016 P T D 2355

INDUS TRADING AND CONTRACTING COMPANY Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE), KARACHI and others —

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2016
Civil Appeal No. 1600 of 2006, decided on 4th January, 2016.

2016 S C M R 842

INDUS TRADING AND CONTRACTING COMPANY — Appellant Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) KARACHI and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2004
N/A

P L D 2004 Lahore 351

Messrs METROPOLE CINEMA PVT. LTD. through Managing Director and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary, Excise and Taxation Department, Lahore and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1992
Writ Petition No.309 of 1990, decided on 8th October, 1991.

1992 C L C 159

MONNOO INDUSTRIES LIMITED‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Finance, Islamabad and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 2003
Writ Petitions Nos. 1144 and 1526 of 1997, decided on 25th May, 2002.

2003 P T D 1002

Messrs LUCKY CEMENT LIMITED Versus C.B.R. and others

Court: Peshawar High Court
PLD 2004
2003-September-30

P L D 2004 Lahore 73

PARKS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. — Petitioner Versus D.G. EXCISE AND TAXATION — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1989
Writ Petition No.568 of 1988, decided on 6th March, 1989.

P L D 1989 Lahore 237

PUNJAB STEEL LIMITED‑‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS,

Court:
PLD 1993
Constitutional Petition No.D‑173 Of 1990, decided on 23rd December, 1992.

P L D 1993 Karachi 87

SALFI TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI‑‑ Petitioner Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (APPRAISEMENT),

Court:
PLD 1977
Constitutional Petition No. 1178 of 1975, heard on 19th April 1977.

Before P L D 1977 Karachi 911

MESSRS YOUSUF RE‑ROLLING MILLS, KARACHI‑Petitioner Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, KARACHI AND ANOTHER- Respondents

Court: S. 18(2)‑Interpretation of statutes‑Provisions contained in any statute bearing on same subject‑matter‑To he so interpreted as to yield a harmonious result, avoiding conflict and contradiction. Interpretation of statutes.