Home Maxims & Terms Malfeasance meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Malfeasance

Malfeasance legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1992 CLC 2412 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
"Misfeasance", "malfeasance" and "non-feasance-Cover a wide range of casesMisfeasance would apply to a case where a lawful act is done in an improper manner

Malfeasance would apply to a case where an act prohibited in law is done by a person and non-feasance would apply to a case where a person omits to do some act prescribed by law.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Malfeasance", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1954

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Malfeasance"

PLC(CS) 2005
Appeal No.40 of 2003, decided on 14th December, 2004.

2005 P L C (C

GHULAM MUSTAFA CHANNA Versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE SINDH and another

Court: Sindh Service Tribunal
PLC 1981
N/A

1981 P L C 607

N. A. SHAHRYAR Versus CONFORCE LTD.

Court: Lahore High Court
YLR 2003
High Court Appeal No.24 of 1999, decided on 26th August, 2003.

2003 Y L R 3314

SWISS BANK CORPORATION through Attorney‑‑‑Appellant Versus Messrs TEMUKA NAVIGATION COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. through Local Agents and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 1979
10th July 1979

1979 C L C 740

SHAHRIYAR-Petitioner N. A. Versus MESSRS CONFORCE LTD., LAHORE-Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 1986
Civil Revision No. 181/D of 1986, decided on 18th January,1986.

1986 C L C 1181

MUNIR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
MLD 2018
2017-March-31

2018 M L D 777

Syed QAMAR SULTAN — Plaintiff Versus JAVED IQBAL GOHAR and another — Defendants

Court: Sindh
PLD 1991
Civil Suit No.329 of 1978, decided on 18th March, 1991

P L D 1991 Karachi 214

MUHAMMAD ZUBAIR QURESHI‑‑Plaintiff Versus MUNIR HUSSAIN SHIRAZI and 4 others‑‑Defendents

Court: ‑‑‑‑Damages‑‑‑Suit for damages on account of misfeasance and malfeasance‑‑ Government Officers, in such suit, being defendants, Government was also not only a proper but a necessary party‑‑‑Plaintiff having dropped Government as a co=dcfcndant in suit, suit for damages on account of misfeasance or malfeasance was not maintainable in respect of any act done by official defendants in their official capacity.‑‑Damages. pp. 218, 219, 220 A, B & C
CLD 2020
2019-December-5

2020 C L D 523

Messrs KASB INVEST (PVT.) LTD. and another — Petitioners Versus The REGISTRAR MODARABA COMPANIES AND MODARABA, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
PLC(CS) 2001
Appeal No. 783-L of 1999, decided on 15th November, 2000.

2001 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD MOBIN GUL KHAN Versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and another

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
CLD 2007
2007-May-7

2007 C L D 1009

Show-Cause Notice No.EMD/233/306/2002-5890-91, dated March 29th, 2007 decided on 7th May, 2007.

Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan