Home Maxims & Terms Caveat emptor, doctrine of meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Caveat emptor, doctrine of

Caveat emptor, doctrine of legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1986 CLC 363 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Caveat emptor, doctrine of Applicability ofSale-deed executed by person without valid power of-attorney, held, was nullity in law

Vendees, having been duped and parting with money without benefit of return were hit by doctrine, "Caveat Emptor".

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Caveat emptor, doctrine of", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1962

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Caveat emptor, doctrine of"

CLC 1986
Second Appeal No. 222 and Revision Application No. 144 of 1980, heard on 7th August, 1985.

1986 C L C 363

Haji YOUSUF‑‑Appellant Versus JALALUDDIN and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLD 2023
2023-February-17

2023 C L D 1348

ARBAZ RAHIM — Appellant Versus The MANAGER/INCHARGE CAREEM and another — Respondents

Court: Islamabad
MLD 1986
Writ Petition No.1162/R of 1978, heard on 1st March, 1986.

1986 M L D 552

Mst. MUNAWAR KHATOON and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER and 2 others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1999
Civil Revision No.85 of 1996, decided on 25th June. 1999

P L D 1999 Peshawar 75

SAID AZAM KHAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ADAM KHAN through Legal Heirs

Court:
SCMR 1984
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No.505/R/1983, decided on 6th February, 1984.

1984 S C M R 1404

FAZAL ELAHI‑‑Petitioner Versus DEWAN AL I (Deceased) (represented by Legal Heirs)

Court: High Court
SCMR 2020
Civil Appeals Nos. 1520, 1521 and 1522 of 2016, decided on 13th November, 2019.

2020 S C M R 352

SHABLA and others — Appellants Versus Ms. JAHAN AFROZ KHILAT and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2023
----S. 10---Contract---Terms and conditions of contract---Where an effective and enforceable contract is not structured by the parties, it is not the domain or province of the Court to make out a contract for them, and the lis would be decided on the basis of terms and conditions agreed and settled down in the contract.

2023 S C M R 815

Rao ABDUL REHMAN (DECEASED) through legal heirs — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL (DECEASED) through legal heirs and others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 2004
Civil Petition No.622 of 2003, decided on 26th February, 2004.

P L D 2004 Supreme Court 493

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus GUL SHER through Legal Representatives‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
MLD 2000
First Appeal from Orders Nos.50 and 51 of 1999, heard on 2nd August, 1999.

2000 M L D 495

Syed AHMAD SAEED KIRMANI‑‑‑Appellant, Versus Raja ASHFAQ SARWAR and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLD 2025
2024-July-4

2025 C L D 393

UBL FUND MANAGEMENT LIMITED — Appellant Versus Ms. MOMY KAMAL and another — Respondents

Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan