Home Maxims & Terms Purpose connected with meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Purpose connected with

Purpose connected with legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1986 CLC 2229 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
"Administration", "working"

Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Purpose connected with", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/1970

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Purpose connected with"

PLD 1969
Appeal from Original Order No. 113 of 1968, decided on 10th April 1969.

P L D 1969 Dacca 979

Mst. LUTFUN NAHAR — Appellant Versus SYEEDA HASHMAT ARA BEGUM AND OTHERS — Respondents

Court:
CLC 1987
Suit No. 1056 of 1979, decided on 5th June, 1986.

1987 C L C 591

CORPORATION LTD.‑‑Appellant Versus THE TRUSTEES OF KARACHI PORT TRUST‑‑Defendant

Court: Karachi
CLC 1986
Suit No. 1056 of 1979, decided on 5th June, 1986.

1986 CLC 2229

CORPORATION Ltd.‑‑Plaintiff Versus The TRUSTEES OF THE KARACHI PORT TRUST‑‑Defendant

Court: Karachi
PLD 1956
Suit No. 500 of 1951, decided on 29th June 1955.

P L D 1956 Sind 25

USMAN BHAI‑Plaintiff Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and another — ‑Defendants

Court:
CLC 1995
Writ Petition No. 234 of 1987/BWP, decided on 13th December, 1994

1995 CLC 626

CANTONMENT BOARD through Executive Officer‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Court: Lahore
PLD 1975
Writ Petition No. 950 of 1973, decided on 16th June 1975.

P L D 1975 Lahore 717

DIRIRK MASQUITIA, BISHOP OF MULTAN‑ — PETITIONER Versus THE MULTAN CANTONMENT BOARD THIIOUOH THE

Court:
PLD 1967
Second Appeal No. 643 of 1961, decided on 16th August 1965.

P L D 1967 Dacca 685

SHAMSUDDIN SARDAR‑Appellant Versus AMIJAN BEWA AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
SCMR 1990
77, 78, 83, 84, 86, 91, 92, 94 to 97, 99, 109 to 111, 128 to 134, 137, 142, 158 to 162, 165 to 169, 187 to 191, 193, 198, 200, 216 to 226, 228 to 232, 234, 237, 288, 317, 318, 330, 331, 349, 352 all of 1987 and 33, 35 of 1988 and C.P. No.161‑R of 1986, decided on 16th October, 1989.

1990 S C M R 98

WAPDA Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD FARID and others‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑ Practice and procedure‑‑‑When a judgment of the Supreme Court had been passed by a Bench of three Judges of the Supreme Court and the review petition directed against said judgment was dismissed by a Bench of five Judges, if it is found that the rule laid down in the said judgment required to he varied, dissented from or overruled, a larger Bench of seven Judges could alone be in a position to do so.‑‑Practice and procedure.
YLR 2007
Constitution Petitions Nos.D-937, D-1171 of 2004, decided on 20th April, 2006.

2007 Y L R 1823

Malik MUHAMMAD SAJJAD and others — Petitioners Versus NAZIM, UC 4 METROVILLE, SITE, KARACHI and others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLC(CS) 2022
Writ Petition No.5787 of 2016, decided on 14th October, 2020.

2022 P L C (C

Sheikh ABDUL KHALIQ and 8 others Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, BOARD OF TRUSTEES, through Secretary Establishment, Islamabad and 4 others

Court: Lahore High Court