Home Maxims & Terms Credit Manual of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Credit Manual of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan

Credit Manual of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2003 SCMR 251 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Credit Manual of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan, Rr.2.17 & 2.28Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.4Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.212(3)Dismissal from service on charge of gross misconduct, negligence and inefficiency

Leave to appeal was granted by the Supreme Court to consider as to whether the rules governing the petitioners were statutory in nature and that inquiry report was not furnished to them, which had violated principles of natural justice; whether authorised officer had failed to issue any notice to petitioners after receiving inquiry report, which had prevented petitioners from explaining their position qua inquiry report; whether Service Tribunal in impugned judgment had not discussed the merits of case of petitioner in spite of the fact that he had been proceeded against on entirely different charges than the one levelled against petitioner in the other petition and whether concerned authority lacked jurisdiction under the rules to decide the matter .

2003 PLC(CS) 36 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Credit Manual of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan, Rr.2.17 & 2.28Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S.4Constitution of Pakistan 1,1973), Art-212(3)Dismissal from service on charge of gross misconduct, negligence and inefficiency

Leave to appeal was granted by the Supreme Court to consider as to whether the rules governing the petitioners were statutory in nature and that inquiry report was not furnished to them, which had violated principles of natural justice; whether authorised officer had tailed to issue any notice to petitioners after receiving inquiry report, which had prevented petitioners from explaining their position qua inquiry report; whether Service Tribunal in impugned judgment had not discussed the merits of case of petitioner in spite of the fact that he had been proceeded against on entirely different charges than the one levelled against petitioner in the other petition and whether concerned authority lacked jurisdiction under the rules to decide the matter.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Credit Manual of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/20686

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Credit Manual of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan"

PLC(CS) 2003
Civil Appeals No.80 to 82 of 2001, decided on 28th June, 2002.

2003 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD SALEEM and 2 others Versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2003
Civil Appeals No.80 to 82 of 2001, decided on 28th June, 2002.

2003 S C M R 251

MUHAMMAD SALEEM and 2 others‑‑‑Appellants Versus AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC 1997
Appeals Nos. HYD‑701, 707 and 708 of 1992, decided on 20th August, 1996.

1997 P L C 569

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN through Joint Director, Hyderabad Region and others Versus ABDUL JABBAR and others

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
CLD 2004
Writ Petition No.2882 of 2003, heard on 8th October, 2003.

2004 C L D 232

Messrs AGRO DAIRIES (PVT.) LIMITED through Director and 2 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Messrs AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN through Branch Manager and 3 others ‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLC 2014
N/A

2014 P L C 260

MUHAMMAD YOUNAS Versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, LAHORE and 3 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLC(CS) 2006
Civil Appeal No.1606(K) CE of 2001, decided on 1st September, 2005.

2006 P L C (C

JAVED IQBAL AWAN Versus ZARA1 TARAQIATI BANK LTD. and 2 others

Court: Federal Service Tribunal
PLC 2010
Appeal No.12(03) of 2009-L/24(150) of 2009-L, decided on 31st August, 2009.

2010 P L C 40

UNITED BANK LIMITED through Power of Attorney Versus MUHAMMAD IQBAL

Court: National Industrial Relations Commission
PLD 1986
Civil Appeals Nos. 93 and 94 of 1985, decided on 14th January, 1986.

P L D 1986 Supreme Court 200

Sh. IHSANUL HAQ PIRACHA‑Appellant Versus MR. WASIM SAJJAD AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: ---S. 5(1)(a)(iv)‑Senate Election Act (LI of 1975), S. 13‑Election petition ‑Estoppel, principle of‑Compendious statutory remedy of an election petition, held, was not qualified or controlled by an exercise of a prior right of objection before Returning Officer to be dealt with summarily under S. 13‑No such restriction or limitation could, therefore, be imported by reference to principle of estoppel. ‑Estoppel.
PLC(CS) 2004
Civil Appeal No. 1208 of 2001, decided on 18th March, 2003.

2004 P L C (C

ABDUL RAUF Versus CHAIRMAN, ADBP, HEAD OFFICE ISLAMABAD and 2 others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLC 1993
Reference No‑3 of 1990, decided on 13th October, 1991.

1993 C L C 833

OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Referring Authority Versus Sardar MUQEEM KHAN KHOSA‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Karachi