Home Maxims & Terms Proceeding meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Proceeding

Proceeding legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2005 CLD 264 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
"Proceedings"

Meaning.

2003 PLD 132 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Proceedings"

Connotation.

2003 PLC(CS) 645 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
ProceedingsMeaning

Term 'Proceedings' shall mean a prescribed course of action for enforcing a legal right.

2001 SCMR 1461 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Proceedings"

Connotation.

1990 CLC 1693 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Words and Phrases Words, "adequate remedy" connote an efficacious, convenient, beneficial, effective and speedy remedy.

1990 CLC 1086 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases Expression "original order"Connotation

Expression "original order" means an order with which the proceedings under the relevant statute commenced.

1988 PTD 754 INCOME-TAX-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
S. 13(1)Word 'proceedings' in S.13gcope and connotation

Discovery by Assessing Officer in regard to undisclosed income of the assessee after conducting an inquiry is in the course of 'any proceedings under this Ordinance'.

1986 PLD 237 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Words "Proceeding", "case", "order" and "any"-Connotation of - Word "proceeding", held, would have wider meaning than word "case"-Word "proceeding" could be given narrow or wide import depending upon nature and scope of enactment in which same was used, in particular context of language of enactment

Word "order" in general would be comprehensive enough to include all kinds of orders including formal orders Word, "any" excludes limitation and qualifications connotating wide generality.

1984 PTD 312 INCOME-TAX-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent

Word "proceeding"-Meaning in legal terminology : Instituting or carrying on of an action of law-1Majority view].

1983 CLC 1352 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

"Proceedings" Meaning of.

1980 CLC 346 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Proceedings"-Meaning. Ranjit Chandra Mitter v. Union of India A I R 1963 Cal. 594 ; Muhammad Akbar v. Province of Punjab P L D 1974 Lah. 231 ; S. V. Seshmull v. S. N. Umaji & Co. A I. R 1962 Mad. 436 and Daulat Ram Phoolchand v. Shriram and others A I R 1964 Madh. Pra. 219 ref.

1979 PCRLJ 1078 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Accused", "offence" and "case"-Connotation. It cannot be argued that the words "accused", "offence" and "case" have been used to connote the same meaning. The word "case" or "offence" has certainly much wider concept or connotation than the word "accused" or "offender". The word "offence" cannot be deemed to limit the jurisdiction to only such accused as are sent up to the Court of Session. Similarly, the word "case" comprehends more than the word "offence". "Case" may include the matter of even those against whom, according to the challan, no offence was made out. For instance, the case of those placed in column No. 2 and perhaps of those covered by clause (a) and clause (c) of subsection (1) of section 190, Cr. P. C., provided the allegations extending to them arise out of the same transaction which is the subject-matter of the case sent to the Court of Session under subsection (3) of section 190, Cr. P. C.

1978 PLD 100 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

S. 2(2)-Word "proceedings"-Moaning.-[Words and phrases].

1968 PLD 1455 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Ss. 3 & 25-Words `proceedings under this Act" in S. 25Comprehensiva enough to include stage at which Commissioner has got to make up his mind under S. 3 to refer case to Tribunal Right of hearing consequently accrues to accused before Commissioner can pass order of reference under S. 3-[Rahmatullah Khan and others v. State P L D 1965 Pesh. 162 overruled].

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Proceeding", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2079

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Proceeding"

PTD 1969
S. C. Petitions Nos. 117 to 133 of 1962, decided on 18th Sep tember 1962.

1969 P T D 363

FIRST ADDITIONAL INCOME‑TAX OFFICER, KARAIKUDI Versus R. SHANMUGHA RAJESWARA SETHUPATHI

Court: Madras (India)
CLC 2024
2022-May-10

2024 C L C 563

Rana KARAMAT — Petitioner Versus FARHAN HAIDER and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1964
Civil Rule No. 195 of 1961, decided on 25th July 1962.

P L D 1964 Dacca 155

AFZAL HOSSAIN TALUKDAR‑Petitioner Versus AINUDDIN SARKAR AND OTHERS‑Opposite‑Parties

Court:
PLD 2011
2011-January-20

P L D 2011 Lahore 246

ALLAH DITTA — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, SHEIKHUPURA and 3 others-Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1950
Regular second appeal No 991 of 1943; decided on 10th Mad 1949, ‑from the order of the subordinate judge of Comilla dated 9th January 1943.

P

JAMINI KUMAR DEY and another‑Appellants Versus RAJ KUMAR KAR and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court:
PCRLJ 1976
Criminal Reference No. 20 of 1975, decided on 12th February 1976.

1976 P Cr

HIDAYAT SHAH AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1949
Criminal Revision No. 1704 of 1946, decided on 22nd December 1947, under section 439, Criminal Procedure Code, of the order of Sessions Judge, Lahore, dated 4th April, 1946.

P L D 1949 Lahore 477

TEJA SINGH‑Petitioner Versus S. KISHEN SINGH‑Respondent

Court: Case‑law discussed.
PLD 1967
Appeal from Appellate Order No. 7 of 1965, decided on 10th February 1965.

P L D 1967 Dacca 621

MANINDRA NATH PARIAL‑Appellant Versus SABER AHMED AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1976
8th July 1976

P L D 1976 Supreme Court 548

Mian NAZIR AHMAD AND 3 others — Appellants Versus Miss SURAYYA PARVEEN AND 3 others — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
YLR 2000
N/A

2000 Y L R 2482

MUHAMMAD GULZAR FAROOQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus SHAUKAT ALI and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore