Home Maxims & Terms Case meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Case

Case legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2003 CLD 689 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
"Case"

Connotation.

1986 PLD 237 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Words "Proceeding", "case", "order" and "any"-Connotation of - Word "proceeding", held, would have wider meaning than word "case"-Word "proceeding" could be given narrow or wide import depending upon nature and scope of enactment in which same was used, in particular context of language of enactment

Word "order" in general would be comprehensive enough to include all kinds of orders including formal orders Word, "any" excludes limitation and qualifications connotating wide generality.

1983 CLC 113 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

S. 115-Words and phrases-Words "case" and "case decided" Meaning-Plaintiff filing application raising controversy between parties whether sufficient grounds for allowing amendment exist or not-Controversy affecting rights of parties-Order allowing amendment, held, falls within scope of "case decided".-[Words and phrases].

1979 PCRLJ 1078 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
"Proceedings"

Meaning. According to the Shorter Oxford Dictionary, "proceeding" means to move onward, to go on with an action, a discourse, an investigation". It further means "the investigation or carrying on of an action at law, a legal action of process, any act done by an authority or a Court of law, any step taken in a case by either party."

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Case", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2083

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Case"

PLD 1971
Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 1971, decided on 22nd June 1971.

P L D 1971 Supreme Court 713

MUHAMMAD SADIQ-Appellant Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court:
PLD 1987
Criminal Revision No, 74 of 1987, decided on 22nd March, 1987.

P L D 1987 Lahore 245

AZIZ-UR-REHMAN-Petitioner Versus THE STATE-Respondent

Court:
PCRLJ 1986
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 73‑T of 1984, decided on 22nd October, 1984.

1986 P Cr

RAFAQAT ALI‑‑Petitioner Versus HIDAYAT ALI and others Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1996
1995-September-3

1996 P Cr

GHULAM HUSSAIN and others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 2015
N/A

2015 P Cr

Mst. AZEEMAN MAI — Petitioner Versus The STATE and 8 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1986
Criminal Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 215 of 1986, decided on 26th July, 1986.

P L D 1986 Supreme Court 737

RASHID AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus ASGHAR ALI AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
YLR 2006
Criminal Appeal No.382-of 2003IBWP, decided on 26th April, 2006.

2006 Y L R 3259

MAKHDOOM AHMED — Petitioner Versus ABDUL HAMEED and others-Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 2004
2003-July-29

2004 M L D 754

SHAHZADO JAFFERI and 6 others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLC 1996
Appeal No. HYD-6 of 1992, decided on 24th September, 1995.

1996 PLC 61

SINDH ABADGAR'S SUGAR MILLS LTD., DINPUR DISTRICT HYDERABAD Versus MUHAMMAD ARAB

Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sindh
PLD 1977
Writ Petition No. 711 of 1976, decided on 1st July 1976.

P L D 1977 Lahore 180

DIN MUHAMMAD SHAKIR alias D. M. SHAKIR‑Petitioner Versus D. S. P., ICHHRA, LAHORE‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑ S. 173 read with S. 155 and Punjab Police Rules, 1934, Vol,III , Chap. XXI V, rr. 24.7 & 24.8‑Investigation of a case by Police‑Situa tions where a move for cancellation of a registered case can be made Re‑investigation of a non‑cognizable case‑Investigation into a matter of civil nature or a non‑cognizable case‑Permission of Magistrate, held, sine qua non in such a case.‑Investigation.