Ordinary
Ordinary legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
"Ordinary Meanings.
"Ordinary"-Meaning.
"Ordinary", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2091
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Ordinary"
2018 P Cr
NADEEM SHAH and another — Petitioners Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief CourtP L D 1980 Lahore 61
Sh. MUHAMMAD RASHID-Petitioner Versus Mst. ZARNIGAR QAISER SHEIKH-Respondent
Court: -- S. 9-Guardianship--"Ordinary residence" -"Dual residence" Concept of dual nationality, dual citizenship, or dual domicile May at most be extended to dual residence-Residence in one country, in case of dual residence, may be notional and real or ordinary in case of other country-Ordinary residence-Means residence in fact and not merely in law-Even animus residendi may not be necessary-Person, held, cannot be treated simultaneously to be "ordinary resident" of both countries within meaning of such expression is S. 9, Guardians and Wards Act, 1890.-Words and phrases.P L D 1961 (W
FIRDOUS TRADING CORPORATION AND OTHERS (Defendants) Appellant: Versus JAPAN COTTON & GENERAL TRADING Co. LTD. (Plaintiffs) Respondents
Court:1981 P L C 19
MESSRS KARACHI PIPE MILLS LTD. Versus EMPLOYEES' UNION
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Sind2017 C L D 1028
FAYSAL BANK LIMITED through VP/Regional Manager SAM (N) — Plaintiff/Decree Holder Versus KNIT KNOT (PVT.) LTD. through Chief Executive and 4 others — Defendants/Judgment Debtors
Court: LahoreP L D 1972 Lahore 311
MESSRS FARID SONS LTD., KARACHI — Petitioner Versus MESSRS GHULAM FARID MOHAMMAD SAEED AND 13 OTHERS ‑Respondents
Court:1972 P T D 453
MESSRS FARID SONS LTD., KARACHI‑ Petitioner Versus MESSRS GHULAM FARID MOHAMMAD SAEED AND 13 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: Lahore (Pakistan)P L D 1966 (W
MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER‑-Petitioners Versus DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, HYDERABAD
Court: (a) West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Act (VII of 1963)----S.3 as amended‑Provision to be strictly construed Opinion of Commissioner that "it is expedient that case be referred to Jirga "‑Not same thing as saying that "it is inexpedient in interest of justice that case be tried by ordinary Courts " Magistrate passing order under S. 3 holding "it is expedient in interest of justice that case be referred for decision of tribunal"‑Order, not in accordance with provisions of S. 3 and so, held, illegal ‑Commissioner, despite omission of words "for reasons to be recorded in writing" from S. 3(1) must give reasons in writing whether in given case it be "inexpedient in interest of justice that case be tried by ordinary Courts"‑West Pakistan Criminal Law (Amendment) Ordinance (XLIV of 1963), S. 3.