Conformity with Injunctions of Islam
Conformity with Injunctions of Islam legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Conformity with injunctions of Islam-Frontier Crimes Regulation, 1901-Merely a law of "convenience" or "expediency" than a law to ensure just and fair decision of cases in tribal regions-Regulation an arbitrary law giving uncontrolled powers to Deputy Commissioner and its repeal recommended by several Law Commissions -Regulation also a discriminatory law applying only to Baluchistan and not to whole of Pakistan-Regulation lacking in universality; or oneness for all, without any kind of discrimination, held, offends against principle of "justice" as propounded by Islam, hence, a bad law and liable to be struck down.-[Muhammadan Law].
"Conformity with Injunctions of Islam", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2097
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Conformity with Injunctions of Islam"
P L D 1981 Supreme Court 334
Elahee Chauhan and Muhammad Afzal Zullah, Members Versus MAHMOOD A. HAROON, FEDERAL MINISTER, RELIGIOUS
Court: ‑‑ Art. 203 D‑Contrariety to injunctions of Islam‑Declaration for removal of certain lacunae in Haj Policy (1980) of Government of Pakistan allegedly not in conformity with Injunctions of Islam‑Matters in issue, held, pertain to branch of law known as Muslim Personal law, applied to community of Muslims alone as distinct from general law applied to all citizens of Pakistan‑Scrutiny of such law, viz. Muslim Personal law‑Beyond jurisdiction of Shariat Benches (Courts as well as Appellate Bench of Supreme Court).‑Jurisdiction.P L D 1992 Quetta I
and another‑‑Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN through SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HOME,
Court:1979 S C M R 509
MUHAMMAD RIAZ‑Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN AND OTHERS ‑RESPONDENTS
Court: ‑‑‑ Part VII, Chap. 3‑A as inserted by Constitution (Amendment) Order (P. O. 3 of 1979)‑Declaration of law as repugnant to injunctions of Islam‑Repugnancy of any law at present in force to injunctions of Islam‑To be decided by High Court on its original side‑High Court also to specify in its judgment day on which its decision to take effect‑Once such decision rendered President, or Governor, as case may be, to take steps to amend law so as to bring same into conformity with injunctions of Islam‑Such law, to extent, held, to be repugnant to cease to have effect on day on which decision of Court takes effect‑Matter still pending before Shariat Bench in High Court and no final order made‑Injunctions of Islam regarding composition of offence of murder, held, not yet enforced and premature for Courts to strike down impugned provisions of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898.P L D 1987 Labors 58
MUHAMMAD SHARIF‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE,
Court: ‑‑Art. 203‑D ‑ Object and scope of Arts. 203‑D(2) & 203‑D(3) Obligation of President/Governor to bring laws in conformity with injunctions of Islam after same having been declared to be repugnant to Islam by Shariat Court/Supreme Court Shariat Appellate Bench and effect of its non‑compliance ‑ Words "if possible" used in Government of N.‑ W. F. P. v. Malik Said Kamal Shah P L D 1986 S C 360‑Connotation of.‑Words and phrases.P D 1991 Supreme Court 368
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, PESHAWAR ZONE, PESHAWAR ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus Messrs SIEMEN A.G.‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑ So long as the existing statutes were not brought in conformity with the Injunctions of Islam Art.227 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) their interpretation, application and enforcement, wherein discretionary judicial elements were involved, only that course would be adopted which was in accord with the Islamic philosophy, its common law and jurisprudence.P L D 1979 Quetta 217
Maulvi MUHAMMAD ISHAQUE KHOSTI‑Appellant Versus GOVERNMENT OF BALUCHISTAN ‑Respondent
Court: Shadat Bench2016 C L D 544
Shaikh AFTAB AHMAD — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad — Respondent
Court: Federal Shariat Court1989 C L C 1683
SULTAN MUHAMMAD and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus Mst. NAJABAT SULTAN and 6 others‑‑Respondents
Court: PeshawarP L D 1980 Peshawar 154
MUMTAZ KHAN‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND 7 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: (a) Constitution (Amendment) Order, 1979 P. O. 3 of 1979‑-----P L D 2014 Federal Shariat Court 15
FAZAL-UR-REHMAN RANA — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad — Respondent
Court: High Court