Home Maxims & Terms Acted Illegally meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Acted Illegally

Acted Illegally legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2003 CLC 240 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Acted illegally" and "acted with material irregularity", meaning of

Term "acted illegally" would mean acting in breach of some provision of law and words 'acted with material irregularity" would refer to committing of some error of procedure in the course of trial which was material and could affect the ultimate decision.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Acted Illegally", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/20985

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Acted Illegally"

CLCN 2019
2018-May-10

2019 C L C Note 3

RIAZ HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD AKBAR KHAN and another — Respondents

Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)
MLD 1998
1997-April-10

1998 M L D 1129

KARIM BAKHSH and 16 others — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, BAHAWALPUR and 4 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1988
Civil Revision No. 232 of 1987, decided on 25th January, 1988

1988 C L C 2314

SALEH MUHAMMAD and others‑‑Petitioners Versus WAPDA and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1971
Civil Appeal No. 15 of 19 71, decided on 2nd March 1971.

1971 S C M R 321

DIL MUHAMMAD AND 2 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus IQBAL MUHAMMAD AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1982
Second Appeal from Original Order No: 17 of 1975/BWP, decided or. 30th March, 1981.

1982 C L C 2210

MUKHTAR AHMAD‑‑Petitioner Versus Hafiz ABDUL HAKEEM‑Respondent

Court: Baghdad‑ul‑Jadid
PLD 1996
Writ Petition No 3451 of 1982, heard on 26th November, 1995.

P L D 1996 Lahore 340

Sheikh MUKHTAR AHMAD ‑‑‑ Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ and 2 others ‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: S. 115 & O.XIII, R. 2 ‑‑‑ Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199‑‑‑ Power of revision under S.115, ~.P.C.‑‑‑Scope ‑‑‑ Case decided ‑‑‑ Connotation ‑‑‑ Trial Court's refusal to admit. document'at belated stage, especially when same was not found to be relevant ‑‑‑ Acceptance of revision against such order‑‑Validity ‑‑‑ Any order admitting or declining to admit evidence oral or documentary, would not amount to "case decided" within meaning of S.115, C.P.C,‑Revision against Trial Court's judgment was, tlius, not competent and Revisional Court acted illegally in accepting the same through judgment in question ‑‑‑ Impugned judgment of Revisional Court was set aside in circumstances. ‑‑Words and phrases.
SCMR 1968
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. K-10 of 1968, decided on 14th February 1968.

1968 S C M R 507

KHUDA BUX-Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2003
Civil Revision No.556‑D of 1993, decided on 18th September, 2002.

2003 C L C 240

HAKAM DAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
CLC 1982
Regular Second Appeal No. 563 of 1980, decided on 3rd November, 1981.

1982CLC653

DR. HASAN ARA AND 6 OTHER s‑Appellants Versus Mian TAJAMMAL HUSSAIN AND 12 OTHERS‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1991
N/A

1991 M L D 1500

IFTIKHAR HUSSAIN and another — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore