Acted
Acted legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Term "acted illegally" would mean acting in breach of some provision of law and words 'acted with material irregularity" would refer to committing of some error of procedure in the course of trial which was material and could affect the ultimate decision.
"Acted", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/20986
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Acted"
P L D 1953 Sind 20
Mufti MASROOR AHMAD‑Plaintiff Versus R. M. MITHANI‑Defendant
Court: High CourtP L D 1973 Supreme Court 98
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, EAST, KARACHI‑Appellant Versus Messrs REYAZ‑O‑KHALID Co., KARACHI‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1958 (W
Mst. MOMINA KHATOON‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN and another
Court:P L D 1994 Karachi 173
Court: ‑‑‑‑S. 213 as amended by Succession (Amendment) Act (XII of 1974), Succession (Amendment) Ordinance (XXXV of 1978) and amending enactment repealed by (Federal Laws (Revision and Declaration) Ordinance (XXVII of 1981)‑‑‑General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 6‑A‑‑‑Effect. of Amending Act, 1974 and Amending Ordinance, 1978, by Federal Laws (Revision and Declaration) Ordinance, 1981‑‑‑If different intention does not appear from the Ordinance XXVII of 1981, cls. (a) & (b) of S. 213, Succession Act, 1925 as introduced by Succession (Amendment) Act, 1974 and Succession (Amendment) Ordinance, 1978 would continue to remain in force in spite of the repeal of Succession (Amendment) Act, 1974 and Succession (Amendment) Ordinance, 1978‑‑‑Interpretation of repeal of such amendments by Ordinance XXVII of 1981.
1992 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD AZIM JAMALI and 11 others Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary/Chairman, Ministry
Court: Karachi High CourtP L D 2001 Azad J&K 4
DIL MUHAMMAD — Petitioner Versus RIAYASAT HUSSAIN
Court: High Court1995 C L C 1740
ABDUL AZIZ‑‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SHAM and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Azad J & K2000 P T D 1497
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus V. NAMBY
Court: 239 I T R 179P L D 2001 Supreme Court 169
MUMTAZ ALI KHAN RAJBAN and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court:2023 Y L R Note 20
SUMAIRA ASHRAF — Appellant Versus Dr. MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore