Home Maxims & Terms Transportation meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Transportation

Transportation legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2004 PTD 1169 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
“Transportation” and "ply"

Meaning.

1999 PTD 1569 GAUHATI-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Hire" and "transportation"

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Transportation", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21017

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Transportation"

SCMR 1971
Civil appeal No. 182 of 1969, decided on 3rd July 1970.

1971 S C M R 454

FAYYAZ ALI KHAN‑Appellant Versus THE GOVIKRNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN THROUGH THE SECRETARY, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: (a) Road Transport Corporation (West Pakistan) Removal of Undesirable Employees Ordinance (VIII of 1965), S. 3 read with Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939) as amended by Act XIX of 1953, S. 9r3‑A(2) and Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Arts. 232 & 181 and Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Arts. 177 & 234‑-F appointed by Punjab Government as Traffic Manager in Provincial Transport Service in 1951‑Service of F transferred to Provincial Road Transport Board created under Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1951 and subsequently to Road Transport Corporation, West Pakistan in 1963‑Service of F terminated under Road Transport Corporation (West Pakistan) Removal of Undesirable Employees Ordinance, 1965‑Question whether F (who was originally Government employee) serving in Road Transport Corporation continued to enjoy protection of guarantee regarding service ensured to Government servant by Constitution or whether on transfer of his service to Transport Board he ceased to be a Government servant‑Held, F continued to be Government servant protected by Constitutional guarantee and Road Transport Corporation (West Pakistan) Removal of Undesirable Employees Ordinance, 1965 nor applicable to such servant-‑Rana Muhammad Jamil v. The Punjab Road Transport Board, Lahore and others P L, D 1957 Lah. 1 overruled.
PLD 1955
Appellate Side No. 16 of 1953‑54, decided on 20th January, 1955, District R. T. A., Lahore.

P L D (Rev

THE HAIDERIA TRANSPORT COMPANY LTD. — Appellant Versus THE PAKISTAN TRANSPORT CO. LTD.‑Respondents

Court: Kh. Abdur Rahim, for Appellant Haideria Transport Co.
PLD 1979
Constitutional Petitions Nos. 122 and 160 of 1977, decided on 9th October 1978.

P L D 1979 Quetta 45

NASAR TRADING COMPANY AND 6 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus PROVINCIAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, BALUCHISTAN, QUETTA AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: Ss. 66 & 50 (2) (it) ‑Appealability of orders‑Specific mention of conditions attached to a permit having been made in S. 66, appeal under such section, held, would include appeal against any condition, of whatever nature, attached to a route permit as well as orders varying or modifying a time‑table to be issued along with route permit, time‑table falling within meaning of "condition"‑Contention that appeal could only be filed on grounds explicitly enumerated in S. 66 itself and that fixation of time not covered thereby ruled out. Appeal (civil).
PLD 1986
Constitutional Petition No. 118 of 1985, decided on 29th June, 1986.

P L D 1986 Quetta 264

GHAGAI TRIBAL TRANSPORT Co.‑Petitioner Versus THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY AND 2 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: Art. 199‑Constitutional jurisdiction‑Question of jurisdiction of Tribunal going to root of matter would be considered. in consti tutional jurisdiction notwithstanding fact that objection with regard thereto bad not been taken at earliest‑If a Tribunal or an Authority 6ndertook to adjudicate upon matters in respect of which law did not provide any Authority to them any action taken or order passed by such an Authority or. Tribunal would be coram non judice‑It would not be just and proper to overlook or ignore to consider pertinent question of jurisdiction even taken for first time in constitutional petition.‑Jurisdiction,
PLD 1961
Appeal No. 4 of 1959‑60, decided on 10th February 1960,

P L D 1961 W P (Rev

Appellant Versus THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,

Court:
PLC 1988
Constitutional Petition No.D‑74 of 1979, decided on 14th April, 1984.

1988 P L C 125

MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ Versus THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KARACHI TRANSPORT CORPORATION

Court: Karachi High Court
PLD 1956
1956-March-1

P L D (Rev

THE MULTAN TRANSPORT Co. LTD.‑Appellant Versus (1) THE WEST PAKISTAN TRANSPORT Co. (REGD.)

Court: High Court
PLD 1951
Appeal No. 1012 of 1949‑50, decided on 17th May, 1951.

P

MUHAMMAD HUSAIN‑Appellant Versus MANAGING DIRECTOR NEW RURAL TRANSPORT COMPANY LTD. and others‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1950
Before J. W . Hearn, Financial Commissioner

P L D (Rev

BARKAT ALI and others‑Appellants Versus CROWN and another‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1951
Before J. W. Hearn, Financial Commissioner

P

ZAMINDARA TRANSPORT COMPANY LTD. — Appellant Versus CROWN-Respondent

Court: