Home Maxims & Terms Clerical Mistake meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Clerical Mistake

Clerical Mistake legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

An error in writing, copying, or calculating, typically made by a clerk or scribe, which can be corrected without altering the substance of the decision.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Clerical Mistake", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21043

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Clerical Mistake"

MLD 2014
2013-March-5

2014 M L D 1023

KHURRAM JALIL and another — Petitioners Versus MISRI KHAN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1965
4th May 1965

P L D 1965 W

NABI BAKHSH‑Petitioner Versus Mst. SABUN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 2001
Writ Petition.No.3980 of 2001, decided on 14th March, 2001.

2001 C L C 1160

ABDUL MAJEED LODHI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus RETURNING OFFICER, HALQA N0.156 TO 163, TEHSIL KAMOKI, DISTRICT GUJRANWALA and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1984
Civil revision No. 24 of 1983 decided on 24th December, 1983.

1984 C L C 726

MUHAMMAD MUNSIF AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus JAN MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: Azad d & K
PLD 1965
Civil Revision No. 407 of 1960, decided on 8th March 1965.

P L D 1965 (W

GHULAM DIN‑Petitioner Versus LAL KHAN AND OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
SCMR 1983
Civil Appeal No. 22/P of 1975, decided on 8th June, 1983.

1983 S C M R 927

Mst. AKHTARI KHANUM-Appellant Versus ABDUL AZIZ KHAN AND OTHERS-Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2010
Writ Petitions Nos. 456, 458 and C.M. No.1725 of 2009, decided on 8th July, 2009.

2010 Y L R 904

FATIMA SUGAR MILLS LTD., FAZALGARH, MUZAFFARGARH through Chief Executive — Petitioner Versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, FOOD DEPARTMENT, LAHORE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1989
Constitutional Petition No.G-64 of 1981, decided on 14th February, 1989.

1989 M L D 1996

PAKISTAN TABACCO COMPANY Ltd. — Petitioner Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS and others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PCRLJ 1987
‑‑‑Ss. 369, 423 &424‑‑Review‑‑When judgment or an order in the nature of a judgment is dated and signed that could not be reviewed Effect of Ss. 424 & 369, Cr.P.C.‑‑Court becomes functus officio after pronouncement of judgment and has no power to revise or review its previous order and if Court does so‑‑Such order would be clearly ultra vires and illegal.‑‑[Review].

1987 P Cr

NIAZI and 3 others‑‑Applicants Versus GHULAM DASTIGIR and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Quetta
YLR 2018
N/A

2018 Y L R 1813

MUHAMMAD IQBAL and others — Petitioners Versus RAB NAWAZ and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)