Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Conceal meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Conceal

Conceal legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1998 PTD 878 INCOME-TAX-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesWords "conceal", "concealment"

Meanings elaborated.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Conceal", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21067

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Conceal"

PTD 1984
Income-tax Appeal No. 1761 of 1982-83, decided on 29th April, 1984.

1984 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal
PTD 1968
Case Reference No. 32 of 1953, decided on 24th August 1956.

1968 P T D 58

RADHA RUKMANI AMMAL Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, MADRAS

Court: Madras (India)
PTD 1998
I.T.A. No.685/HQB of 1987-88, decided on 21st October, 1997.

1998 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 2010
N/A

2010 PTD 534

Messrs MASOODURREHMAN, KOHAT Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) PESHAWAR

Court: Peshawar High Court
PTD 1994
(viii) In all cases where version of taxpayer is not accepted the penalty proceedings shall not be attracted ipso facto although the rejection of taxpayer's version may justify the addition to his total income. A reasonable difference of opinion on the point of law or principles of accountancy shall not attract the imposing of penalty. Mere lack of evidence in support of a claim in Trading or Profit and Loss Account or substantiating a transaction shall not entail the levy of penalty though it may be considered sufficient for making disallowance and consequent addition to the total income. A bona fide belief on the part of an assessee on a point of factor law shall entitle him for extending benefit of doubt. However, a deliberate suppression of a transaction or fact or concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income resulting in the loss of revenue shall give presumption of guilty intent on the part of assessee and Assessing Officer shall be justified in drawing adverse inference. All these observations are subject to all the deeming provisions contained in the statute or enacted by the legislature from time to time. However, each case is to be decided on its own merits in the light of its own peculiar facts and circumstances.

1994 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
CLC 2008
2007-October-4

2008 C L C 75

SALAHUDDIN — Applicant Versus Mst. ZOHRA BEGUM and 6 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PTD 2002
Tax Case No. 1674 of 1984 (Reference No .1199 of 1984), decided on 12th February, 1998.

2002 P T D 831

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus S. SANKARAN

Court: Madras High Court (India)
PTD 1993
I.TA. No.213/LB of .1987-88, decided on 16th September, 1992.

1993 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 1991
I.TA. No.445/HQ of 1988-89, decided on 4th February, 1991.

1991 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 1998
Tax Case No.1066 (Reference No.558 of 1981), decided on 31st January, 1996.

1998 P T D 2950

HENRY ISIDORE Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 222 I T R 496

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library