Home Maxims & Terms Punjab Excise Manual meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Punjab Excise Manual

Punjab Excise Manual legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1985 PCRLJ 778 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 4

Punjab Excise Manual, Vol. III, para. 4.19 and Form M.29-Officer or authority, under law or statutory rules, required to do certain things under certain manner

Such things, held, must be strictly done in that manner

Para. 4.19 and Form M.29, Punjab Excise Manual, Vol. III, forming part of statutory rules and instructions issued by a competent authority as such binding upon officer concerned

Report of Chemical Examiner and letter of invoice or forwarding letter by Excise Inspector being not strictly in accordance with requirement of Form M.29, held, created doubt on prosecution case

Case of prosecution not proved beyond reasonable doubt

Accused given benefit of doubt and acquitted in circumstances.

[Benefit of doubt].

1985 PCRLJ 8 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
Punjab Excise ManualS. 76Evidence Act (I of 1872), S. 45Recovery of intoxicant-Liquor, Lahan

Statement of Excise Officer, held, not sufficient to prove under section 76, Punjab Excise Act, 1914 nature of Lahan recovered from accused unless it was proved through scientific analysis by independent agency.

[Recovery].

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Punjab Excise Manual", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21105

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Punjab Excise Manual"

PCRLJ 1985
Criminal Appeal No. 72/1, of 1983, decided op 9th August, 1984.

1985 P Cr

SHAMMAN‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court
PCRLJ 1985
Criminal Appeal No.173/I of 1984, decided on 17th January, 1985.

1985 P Cr

MUHAMMAD FAROOQ‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Court: Federal Shariat Court
PCRLJ 2006
2006-March-10

2006 P Cr

Dr. NASIR ALI — Appellant Versus S.H.O. POLICE STATION GHULAM MUHAMMADABAD FAISALABAD and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1952
Appellate Side No. 438 of 1950‑51, decided on 14th May, 1952, District Mianwali.

P L D (Rev

Sh. ABDUL BASHIR‑Appellant Versus CROWN‑Respondent

Court:
PTD 1981
N/A

1981 P T D 177

MURREE BREWERY COMPANY LTD., RAWALPINDI Versus BOARD OF REVENUE PUNJAB (EXCISE AND TAXATION), LAHORE AND 2 OTHERS

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 1954
Letters Patent Appeal No. 16 of 1952,decided on 4th December, 1953.

P L D 1954 Lahore 188

Mian AKBAR HUSSAIN‑Appellant Versus PUNJAB GOVERNMENT Respondent

Court:
PLD 1958
Writ Petition No. 84 of 1957, decided on 11th March, 19 58, under Article 170 of the Constitution.

P L D 1958 (W

MURREE BREWERY Co. LTD-‑Petitioner Versus THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN and others‑-Respondents

Court:
PLD 2017
2016-June-27

P L D 2017 Lahore 230

MURREE BREWERY COMPANY LIMITED through Chief Executive — Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 2017
Writ Petition No.24811 of 2015, decided on 27th June, 2016.

2017 P T D 283

MURREE BREWERY COMPANY LIMITED through Chief Executive Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 1960
Writ Petition No. 462 of 1960, decided on 30th June 1960.

P L D 1960 (W

NISAR‑UL‑HAQ B. BI LLIMORIA‑Petitioner Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF WEST PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: Punjab Excise Act (I of 1914), S. 43 read with r. 5.12, Punjab Liquor Licence Rules‑Rule S 12 not mere direction‑Refusal to renew licence must be preceded by issue of notice to licensee in terms of r. 5.12‑Government's omission to make a valid order of refusal‑Implies decision to renew‑Licensee has no right to "claim" renewal in view of S. 43‑Muhammad Asghar v. Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Punjab, Lahore P L D 1955 Lah. 167 dissented from.