Succeed
Succeed legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
......Succeed" and "succession"???Meaning???"Succeed" means "to take the place of" and "succession" means "coming after or following", coming to another's place, or succeeding one to another.
"Succeed", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/21122
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Succeed"
P L D 1960 (W
AHMAD DIN AND OTHERS‑ — Plaintiffs — Appellants Versus FATEH MUHAMMAD AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: (a) Custom (Punjab)‑----Succession‑Ancestral property‑(A rains of Salamatpura near Lahore)‑Appointment of heir‑Appointee dying issueless‑Widow succeeding on life estate‑Succession on death of widow‑(i) Property reverts to daughter of last male holder (i.e. appointer) ; in absence of daughter, to her sons, but not to collaterals of last male holder (per Shabir Ahmad, J.)‑(ii) Property reverts neither to collaterals nor to daughter or daughter's heirs, but goes to "personal heirs" of appointee‑heir (per Kaikaus, J.)‑Reversionary interest‑Explained‑Rattigan's Digest of Customary Law, para. SS; A I R 1934 Lah. 725 ref..P L D 1957 (W
(Mst.) IRSHAD BEGUM‑Defendant‑Appellant Versus SHAH MUHAMMAD and others‑Respondents
Court: High Court1983 C L C 2853(1)
‑Appellant Versus Mst. ZAINAB AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D (Rev
JI WAN‑.Petitioner Versus SHERA and others‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1966 Supreme Court 349
Mst. RAHMAT BIBI AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus IBRAHIM‑Respondent
Court:1985 S C M R 1725
Mst. RAZ KHANUM BIBI — Appellant Versus NAZIR AHMAD and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1986 Supreme Court 231
MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD YAR AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑ Ss. 15 & 13‑Words "in order of succession" in S. 15 mean that under Islamic law if there is contest between "sharers" or some "sharers" or some "residuaries" who succeed simultaneously and none excludes the other and each succeeds up to the extent of his share, then as the order of succession was same and none succeeds up to extent of his share, prior and in preference to other, suit would fail if pre‑emptor and vendee were heir of said categories Vendee, if was an utter stranger, then whole body of heirs, failing them two or more thereof, and failing them any individual or a class or a group could sue for whole bargain.‑Words and phrases.P L D 1956 Supreme Court (Pak
ABDULLAH AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus Mst. BAKHTO MAT AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1955 Federal Court 102
MUHAMMAD SHAFI and others‑Defendants-Appellants Versus IBRAHIM (deceased) and others‑Defendants -Respondents
Court:P L D 1963 Supreme Court 543
GHULAM AKBAR AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus Mst. IRSHAD BEGUM AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: (a) Custom (Punjab)‑--(Succession)‑Widow "normally" does not take a share of "inheritance" "with sons of deceased" Widow, in presence of son by other wife, having had half share of property, such share, held, in circumstances of case, to have been obtained by way of "inheritance" not in lieu of "mainten ance"‑"Rattigan's Digest of Customary Law", 13th Edn. by Om Parkash Aggarwalla.